This is pretty scary when you think about it. The apparent blueprint for pushing vaccines, while covering up conflicting information which shows the
harm vaccines can do, and using us a guinea pigs while scientists/doctors line their pockets, started back in 1976.
The concept of vaccinating to immunize began in 1796, when British apothecary (pharmacist) Edward Jenner inserted cowpox pus under the skin of an
eight year old boy. Jenner based his experiment on an unsubstantiated rumor that anyone who had experienced cowpox would be immune to smallpox. Over
the next couple of years, Jenner vaccinated others with cowpox to immunize them against smallpox. Without any actual proof of efficacy and safety,
Jenner impressed King George III enough with a bogus immunization guarantee that he was awarded the equivalent of today's $500,000.
Thus, Jenner was the first medical professional to administer diseased matter as medication to a healthy person and receive a substantial financial
award. He was also the first to constantly denounce vaccination detractors successfully. He was protecting both his ego and large public purse.
As we see today, other medical professional were aware of the outlandish claims.
Many health professionals throughout the 19th Century knew that there had been several cases of smallpox among those with cowpox histories. Jenner's
premise was flawed.
Furthermore, as we still see in todays medical field, no matter what other studies show, no matter the efficacy of the vaccine, no matter how many
children still end up getting sick from the disease the vaccination was guaranteed to prevent, the vaccine will continue to be pushed on the public,
and concerns ignored.
This was actually the beginning of a tradition that is carried on by today's vaccinators. Come up with a bogus solution to prevent a disease, make a
bundle of cash, and shut down reasonable arguments from those who know immunization by vaccination doesn't work safely or effectively.
England's incidents of smallpox after vaccination rose steadily from five percent in the beginning to 95% by 1895. There was even a serious epidemic
around 1872, one year after smallpox vaccinations were decreed mandatory in the UK. The mortality rate among smallpox victims also shot up five fold
around that time.
Despite intelligent protests with obvious facts and figures disproving efficacy, and proving harm from toxic materials and viruses contained in
vaccines that endanger natural immunity, the inoculation for immunization premise has been maintained.
Yet, it isn't the 1700's or 1800's anymore, so hopefully if there was evidence that a vaccine was not working, or has the efficacy claimed by the
drug pushers, than doctors/scientists would reconsider pushing the vaccine on children and in schools, right?
A 2012 study led by Dr. David Witt, an infectious disease specialist at the San Rafael, California Kaiser Permanente Medical Center concluded that
whooping cough occurs more among vaccinated children than children not vaccinated.
How about mumps, where as a kid in New York I too was given the vaccine and assured there was nothing else to worry about, that the vaccine would do
In 2010, a mumps outbreak occurred among 1000 children in upper New Jersey and lower New York. Almost 80% of them had been vaccinated with the MMR
(measles, mumps & rubella) vaccine.
How about Measles? The vaccination for measles is considered pretty standard, safe, and breakouts of measles isn't something we should be worrying
about nowadays, right?
Throughout the 1980s, official agencies reported several outbreaks of measles occurring among children who had been vaccinated in various locations
including an Illinois junior high and high school, a Massachusetts high school, a region in France, and a rural area near Helisinki, Finland. Both USA
schools had well over 90% vaccinated against measles.
The vaccinators claim a 90% vaccination rate among any specific population guarantees herd immunity for that population. This bogus claim serves to
create more revenue while blaming non-vaccinators for endangering humanity.
On top of all this, the FDA doesn't have acceptable channels for communication regarding any adverse effects one might suffer from a vaccine. Many
reports apparently don't get through to the people who need to know that the vaccine is not safe, and can cause some serious adverse events. Yet,
given this has been going on for over a hundred years, I doubt even if the complaints did get through to the right people, they'd be ignored, in the
name of big business.