I'm pretty sure this building is going to collapse - Sharjah Skyscraper!

reply to post by VitriolAndAngst

Can you PLEASE do more than just breeze through Wikipedia before you comment. You package C4 in flame retardant gel -- or whatever.

I read the whole article before posting. I have handled C-4, powder and gel explosives.(oops, forgot ANFO)

Can you ever admit to what you post?
You said that C-4 is highly flame retardant.
Nothing could be further from the truth.

So your response is that I don't read? Then you say this....."You package C4 in flame retardant gel -- or whatever."
Whatever? I guess that means that you have researched 'whatever' you think that they packaged the C-4 in????

reply to post by butcherguy


en.wikipedia.org...:_Volcano_in_New_York

It was on TV - so according to truthers logic must be true.......


(as an aside - parts of New York and adjacent New Jersey are built on ancient lava flows 200 million years
old - ie Palisades and Watchung Hills (where I live)

Originally posted by DorianSoran
reply to post by vipertech0596

 

AMEN!!!

You are 100% correct, but don't tell the OP that as you will ruin the fantasy world he lives in. Whats that, he has blinders on and ear plugs in you say? Good, then no chance of him seeng/hearing what you said. He can continue in his own world making posts that are nothing but bad science at best, and outright intentional blurred analogy at worst!

Dorian Soran

I am guess they are talking about the NIST report and their claim that 7 fell due to fire. NIST also said that fire was a contributing factor in collapse of 1 and 2. So I am guessing they are comparing fires

Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by butcherguy

 

en.wikipedia.org...:_Volcano_in_New_York

It was on TV - so according to truthers logic must be true.......


(as an aside - parts of New York and adjacent New Jersey are built on ancient lava flows 200 million years
old - ie Palisades and Watchung Hills (where I live)

Wow, now I’m really impressed.

Attention all truthers!
Mr. Firefighter/Secret service/Aviation/Engineer/Secret agent specialist is also a Disaster specialist.

reply to post by JibbyJedi


nice..

too bad the "911 commission" a$$ kissers wont bother asking honest questions though..

i like how they know everything about building 7 but not one word is mentioned in the report..

oh well..

never mind the robots..

thanks for posting..

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by SimontheMagus

 

Unfortunately for them, the steamroller is approaching full speed and nothing can stop disclosure from happening. Thanks mostly to the Internet.

A steamroller at full speed!!! That's really a good one. Yep, you may be right - the truth movement is zipping along like a steamroller!!!! (Just for clarification - steamrollers are very, very, very slow and also "steamrollers" haven't been in use for about 80 years).

It's a metaphor.... and its about momentum.... two more words you probably have to look up in the dictionary....

It's really good that you don't even know what's going on around you... you'll just continue helping the truth movement by making the OS look even more ridiculous than it is.

Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
I have to wonder at people who show such GLEE at the concept that we will not see justice for 9/11 -- I really do.

Yes it is quite revealing isn't it. Even OS'ers admit that the Gov't was at the very least grossly negligent on the morning of 911. No one has been punished or even reprimanded.

Let's take Rumsfeld and Cheney for example. In June of 2001, that incredible month when so many things were taking place in preparation for PNAC's "New Pearl Harbor" event, Rumsfeld changed a long-standing directive that stated who was authorized to shoot down aircraft.... this removed that ability from everyone except him and the BIG DICK....

The 'Stand-Down Order'

911review.com...

This would mean, of course, that the responsibilty for this royal "screw-up" was ALL THEIRS. THEY OWN IT. They can't blame anyone else.

Were they dealt with accordingly?

No, and these equally traitorous Internet morons keep defending them and are ecstatic that they appear to be walking away scot free, just like they always have. That's why the "Pearl Harbor" comparison by PNAC is so appropriate.

Originally posted by BIHOTZ
wow, it won't fall though....you need jet fuel to burn magically hotter than a sun going super nova

Originally posted by reeferman
never mind the robots..

These shills are not robots. Robots do as they are programmed to do and they don't get paid for it.

reply to post by SimontheMagus

No one has been punished or even reprimanded.

Name the exact crime they commited.
Show us a link to the law they broke. Don't say something stupid like treason. Be specific.
Show us proof that they broke this law.

I'll bet you can't. Otherwise someone in the MSM would have brought it up long before you came into the picture.

Originally posted by samkent
Don't say something stupid like treason.

Treason is stupid? Treason in this case led to MASS MURDER, not only on 911 but in the Afghanistan and Iraq heroin-oil wars that have followed. You have long since disqualified yourself from any rational discussion. This just cements your mindless arrogance.

For anyone else lurking who might not have seen the evidence of the stand-down this is just the tip of the iceberg.

911 Commission - Trans. Sec Norman Mineta Testimony

www.youtube.com...

Dick Cheney Orders NORAD To Stand Down

www.youtube.com...

Dick Cheney commanded NORAD

www.youtube.com...

POWERFUL EVIDENCE THAT AIR FORCE WAS MADE TO STAND DOWN ON 9-11

emperors-clothes.com...

reply to post by SimontheMagus


So you can't name one actual crime?

I didn't think so.

You are just upset that the rest of the world doesn't see 911 the way you do.
Consider this. If 99% of the world see things differently than you do then there is a 99% chance you are wrong.

Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by SimontheMagus

 

So you can't name one actual crime?

I didn't think so.

You are just upset that the rest of the world doesn't see 911 the way you do.
Consider this. If 99% of the world see things differently than you do then there is a 99% chance you are wrong.

Oh I see. Mass murder isn't a crime to you.

How's the weather up there in that dream world of yours?

Like I said, statements like this cement the fact that you have absolutely no credibility.

reply to post by SimontheMagus

Like I said, statements like this cement the fact that you have absolutely no credibility.

I'm not the one claiming there was a crime.

What you are doing is hand waving.

Please name the crime commited by an official in our government.

Originally posted by samkent

I'm not the one claiming there was a crime.

What you are doing is hand waving.

Please name the crime commited by an official in our government.

Dude, seriously, they might fire you after this performance.

Can you flip burgers without serious injuring yourself and those around you? It could be the next stop in your illustrious career.....

Originally posted by SimontheMagus

Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
I have to wonder at people who show such GLEE at the concept that we will not see justice for 9/11 -- I really do.

Yes it is quite revealing isn't it. Even OS'ers admit that the Gov't was at the very least grossly negligent on the morning of 911. No one has been punished or even reprimanded.

Let's take Rumsfeld and Cheney for example. In June of 2001, that incredible month when so many things were taking place in preparation for PNAC's "New Pearl Harbor" event, Rumsfeld changed a long-standing directive that stated who was authorized to shoot down aircraft.... this removed that ability from everyone except him and the BIG DICK....

The 'Stand-Down Order'

911review.com...

This would mean, of course, that the responsibilty for this royal "screw-up" was ALL THEIRS. THEY OWN IT. They can't blame anyone else.

Were they dealt with accordingly?

No, and these equally traitorous Internet morons keep defending them and are ecstatic that they appear to be walking away scot free, just like they always have. That's why the "Pearl Harbor" comparison by PNAC is so appropriate.

Perhaps us "traitorous internet morons " are in fact better informed than you. The June 2001 memo you refer to was was the CJCSI no. 3610 of June 1st 2001. It dealt with aircraft hi-jacking and it freed up the procedure rather than restricting it. You are listening to too much Alex Jones.

And as for a NORAD standown order I find it hard to believe that anyone can still be bringing this unsubstantiated rubbish up in 2012. There is evidence for a shootdown order :-

zbigniewmazurak.wordpress.com...

reply to post by Alfie1

And as for a NORAD standown order I find it hard to believe that anyone can still be bringing this unsubstantiated rubbish up in 2012. There is evidence for a shootdown order :-

So you agree that Cheney violated the Constitution on 9/11 by issuing unauthorized orders to shoot down planes?

reply to post by SimontheMagus

Dude, seriously, they might fire you after this performance.

Can you flip burgers without serious injuring yourself and those around you? It could be the next stop in your illustrious career.....

You claimed there was a crime and this is your response?

Why don't you just admit that you feel there must be a crime somewhere because it was a terrible day?

Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by SimontheMagus

 

Dude, seriously, they might fire you after this performance.

Can you flip burgers without serious injuring yourself and those around you? It could be the next stop in your illustrious career.....

You claimed there was a crime and this is your response?

Why don't you just admit that you feel there must be a crime somewhere because it was a terrible day?

Issuing unauthorized orders to shoot down planes is a crime, isn't it?

Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by Alfie1

 

And as for a NORAD standown order I find it hard to believe that anyone can still be bringing this unsubstantiated rubbish up in 2012. There is evidence for a shootdown order :-

So you agree that Cheney violated the Constitution on 9/11 by issuing unauthorized orders to shoot down planes?

The allegation was that NORAD had been ordered to standown and now you are arguing about the legality of a shootdown order !

But, just as a matter of interest, what does the Constitution say about shooting down civilian airliners ?