Libya's Gaddafi-era oil chief found floating dead in Danube, page 1

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times

Topic started on 29-4-2012 @ 08:45 PM by Agent_USA_Supporter

Libya's Gaddafi-era oil chief found floating dead in Danube

www.reuters.com

No sign of foul play - police

VIENNA, April 29 (Reuters) - Libya's former top oil industry official, Shokri Ghanem, has been found floating dead in the River Danube in Austria, police said on Sunday.

(visit the link for the full news article)

Related News Links:
www.bbc.co.uk

reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 08:45 PM by Agent_USA_Supporter

Well this is interesting former oil official the oil industry chief defected from Gaddafi and made an YouTube video of his defection was found dead in Vienna,Danube.

And The police say there were no signs of violence that pushed him? yet in the bbc article they mention this.

( But it's also possible that he became ill and fell into the water." )

In my opinion i think they killed him because he may known as much as Gaddafi and wanted him silenced.

www.reuters.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

edit on 29-4-2012 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 08:53 PM by libertytoall

It's just a coincidence. Sort of like Breitbart, Wellstone, Beverly Eckert, countless research scientists, etc..

reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 09:06 PM by Sandalphon

Cyanide. The poison that makes you gurgle before you die.

Or for a conspiracy straight out of a movie, perhaps someone will find out his lungs contained chlorinated pool water, not Danube water.

How much was he worth?

reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 09:09 PM by stanguilles7

The BBC article says he was living and working in Austria:

Police spokesman Roman Hahslinger said Mr Ghanem was dressed when he was found but had no personal identification documents on him, with the exception of one naming the company he was working for. An employee of the company had identified him, the spokesman said.

Who was he working for?

reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 09:52 PM by wewillnotcomply666

no signs of foul play ? BULLS**T!. because there isnt any visible signs does not mean he simply fell and drowned in the river ?

reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 10:04 PM by stanguilles7

Originally posted by wewillnotcomply666
no signs of foul play ? BULLS**T!. because there isnt any visible signs does not mean he simply fell and drowned in the river ?

All it means is no signs of foul play, not that foul play is completely ruled out.

It just means they didnt find him with bruises around the neck, signs of a struggle, bullet holes, etc.

Pages: ^^TOP^^