Men: Your thoughts on tattoos and women?, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 06:17 PM by artistpoet
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by artistpoet
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by artistpoet
reply to
post by jiggerj



Heres one for you jigger

forums.pelicanparts.com...


Now THAT would make a great tattoo! Only, I'm picturing Bozo's nose on a boob now. Oh gawd it's official, I AM a dirty old man!


jigger - why not two bozos then for symmetry
perhaps that is why Bozo is smiling
edit on 29-4-2012 by artistpoet because: (no reason given)


Now let's get serious here. Two bozos would be absolutely ridiculous. I'm thinking a captain America shield on the other one.


See - You are coming around to idea of tats on women
Making suggestions too


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 06:21 PM by schuyler
The problem with tattoos is that they are permanent additions (more or less) to your skin. As such, they can "type" you as belonging to a certain social class, especially if they are easily visible. The same is true of piercings and other alterations. A "tramp stamp" can become a liability. A small or discrete alteration probably won't hurt you, but a facial or hand tattoo could prevent you from certain kinds of work in the future. Of course, if you are a Maori from New Zealand, you can do it because everyone knows (or should know) that this is a part of your cultural tradition. But pictures of a devil on your face are not. All they show is an OCD personality.

Now I can hear the howling from here. people will say, "I am who I am and I will never betray that!" That's great. Really. Stars, flags, points, and applause for you, but you're sick and show a certain lack of forethought. Things have a way of changing, and the fact is you may not feel quite the same way at 50 as you do at 20.

When I was 20, for example, I swore I would "never wear a suit" and "never cut my hair!" because these were symbols of the establishment (a suit) and not adhering to the establishment (the hair) and I was out to make a statement, by God! As it turned out life moved on and I got older. I still resisted wearing a suit, but I was in a profession where this was more or less expected. Finally and old guy who felt sorry for me took me aside. This is what he said,

"A suit makes you equal. No one knows your cultural background when you look more or less like everyone else. You could have graduated from Harvard or Evergreen State." (a left-wing small public college in Washington State) "The whole idea is to make it so you have versatility and movement. Only your brain and your emotions can hurt you, but no one will prejudge you on how you look. If you persist, your career is going to suffer."

I had never thought of it in quite the same way before. So I relented a bit and finally, years later, cut my hair. My goodness, I've never felt such a sense of relief! I wished I had done that years ago. Life is so much less of a hassle now.

You know who else got this same lecture a long time ago? Disraeli, the British Prime Minister, who went through the same sort of thing as a young man.

When I see people who overdo it on piercings, who "grow" horns and bumps in their heads, or who have visible tattoos I really feel sorry for them. They have stuck themselves at an emotional age they can now never leave, but they WILL get older, when this sort of stuff will begin to look uglier and uglier as the years move on. If you are discrete about it, everything should be fine, but if you are ostentatious about it, you've really messed up. Good luck to you because you're going to need it.


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 07:42 PM by Cuervo
reply to post by silent thunder



Personally, I feel the more, the merrier. As long as the tattoos aren't too cliche or unoriginal. As long as there's a bit of story behind them, I dig them all.

The only automatic tattoo turn off for me is when the woman has little to no other tattoos but has that one single lower-back tramp stamp. Soooo tacky. (if she has tons of ink and that's just some of it, that's forgivable).

The only tattoos my wife and I have are our wedding rings but we fully encourage each to get more. Soon.


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 11:56 PM by chr0naut
reply to post by silent thunder



I have never seen a woman who looks better to me with a tattoo.

Also, (not everyone knows, but) taking a 'mark in the flesh' is expressly forbidden by God (Leviticus 19:28).

edit on 29/4/2012 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 30-4-2012 @ 12:09 AM by irsuccubus
My left arm is half sleeved and I have a large one on my upper chest. I paid good money to make sure I got quality art from well trained professional and not some scratcher because I had 50 dollars burning a hole in my pocket. Each piece is carefully selected and thought over at length because after all...they are permanent. My husband does not mind mine and in fact finds them rather attractive. Even though he is not nearly the enthusiast I am (he has one small one on his bicep) he has no issue with me adding more ink. He knows that I eventually want to sleeve both arms completely and this was discussed even in the very early stages in our relationship.

Knowing who I am he knows that I have enough pride in the work I sport that I wont get anything that would be considered "not my style" (vulgairties, trendy crap, names, words, fruit) and we have an agreement that I leave my boobs, hands and girly bits alone. I am the same person with tattoos as I am without. And as the owner of this meat suit I personally feel that I can decorate it however I want. I was never one for caring much for what others thought of me and even when my ink has been covered people have formed judgements based on other superficial things. So screw it. Even after years of having them I look at the pictures on the daily and admire them. I am an art lover...and now I get to carry some of my favorite art with me everywhere I go.

Don't like ink...fair enough...to each his own...but some of us made the choice to add pictures to our bodies and even if those choices are not agreed with they should be respected. There are enough women who feel the same about tattoos where there will be no shortage of unmarked cuties for you.


reply posted on 30-4-2012 @ 01:38 AM by snusfanatic
reply to post by silent thunder



My thoughts are that they're usually trashy. Ironically I find the ones that are supposed to be 'tasteful' to be the most trashy and the ones that are larger/more noticeable to be beautiful at times. A rainbow star on your ankle just screams white-trash, but having something really significant, no matter how big or noticeable can be pretty cool. Its about owning it. And I'll take issue with your 'deal with it haters.' If someone permanently scars their body with art, I don't think jealousy or irrational hatred is required to find it distasteful haha.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Men, Who Needs Them?
  Posted 12 days ago with 28 member flags
Convince Us Why Marriage is Worthwhile
  Posted 3 days ago with 8 member flags
Can You Love Someone Who is NOT Physically Attractive To You?
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags
Karma is a b****
  Posted 16 days ago with 4 member flags
Opposing My Best Friends Relationship, Right or Wrong?
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags
The key to each heart
  Posted 7 days ago with 2 member flags
Love is blind because...
  Posted 8 days ago with 2 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 60 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live:162: Tornados! Murder! Cover Ups! Obama-Gate! WOW!