It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by golemina
Can I ask a dumb question...
why stop now?
Where is the answer for the age of the Earth? (You know 4.5 bill.... etc. etc.)
That is a fairly specific assertion... I'm looking for that specific methodology.
why don't you ask someone who made that assertion?
And I see you still don't actually provide any actual evidence for to support your claims other than sharp rocks - just more attacks on me because I dare to say you haven't provided any answers.
Originally posted by Soshh
This thread is amazing. I didn't think that these people actually existed. I feel like I have seen an elf or something.
Originally posted by golemina
Originally posted by Soshh
This thread is amazing. I didn't think that these people actually existed. I feel like I have seen an elf or something.
Hey.
Stick around...
You ain't seen NOTHING yet.
Originally posted by golemina
You ain't seen NOTHING yet.
Originally posted by Soshh
I can't wait.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by golemina
Several volumes??
And yet all your posts in this thread fit on a single web page so far.
And not one of them actually contains a link to anything else.
and you won't actually say which of your posts contain any evidence at all - from which I also conclude that you do not think there is any evidence in any of them.
you have offered to help.......and yet have not bothered to answer the 1 question I have asked.
apparently there is something up Mt Rainier that is evidence - but you won't say what it is, or link to any analysis of it.
I think 12 years old might be overestimating your age.
Originally posted by TheComte
Originally posted by OpenEars123
I GENUINELY cannot think of anything more ridiculous than the earth being 6000 years old. No wait a minute!....... Nope, still nothing.
I know. And yet you'll never convince a zealot.
Originally posted by golemina
How is it we believe the Earth to be 4.5 billions years... EXACTLY what is our basis in fact? How did Mr. Magic Cueball come up with the number 4.5 billion in the little view port?
Radiometric Dating
Originally posted by golemina
Radiometric dating?
Good.
Now show me the math.
Originally posted by TheComte
Originally posted by golemina
Radiometric dating?
Good.
Now show me the math.
I could...
, but why would I take the time when you don't take the time to answer anybody's questions? You tell everyone to go read Velikovsky. Well, I did and found him to be less than credible. He even admits his physics are not correct. He's right up there with Sitchin.
Now it's your turn. Go read up on radiometric dating. You asked how we arrive at the figure of 4.5 billion years old and that's the answer right there.
When you're done come back here and post your thoughts. I look forward to your critique of the material presented.
Originally posted by TheComte
More gibberish. I'm truly shocked.
So, I guess you didn't read up on how we KNOW the age of the earth.
I have to admit you are the type of character ATS needs to remain entertaining. Keep up the good work.
edit on 3-5-2012 by TheComte because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by golemina
This is SO funny...
Oh you 'know'...
Please do share.
I have acquired several samples from a mountain on the Enumclaw Plateau. Check.
Am ready to acquire samples from both Mt. Rainier as well as the Olympic Mt range. Date to be determined. Check.
The workspace has already been cleared in the lab (Read: It's really just a workshop. But it will do. ). Check.
Let's see... All we are missing is TheComte recommending to us which 'Radiometric dating' method is preferable in his expert opinion...
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
I have acquired several samples from a mountain on the Enumclaw Plateau. Check.
Am ready to acquire samples from both Mt. Rainier as well as the Olympic Mt range. Date to be determined. Check.
The workspace has already been cleared in the lab (Read: It's really just a workshop. But it will do. ). Check.
Let's see... All we are missing is TheComte recommending to us which 'Radiometric dating' method is preferable in his expert opinion...
Why don't you just take your samples to a lab and get them tested??
Originally posted by golemina
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
I have acquired several samples from a mountain on the Enumclaw Plateau. Check.
Am ready to acquire samples from both Mt. Rainier as well as the Olympic Mt range. Date to be determined. Check.
The workspace has already been cleared in the lab (Read: It's really just a workshop. But it will do. ). Check.
Let's see... All we are missing is TheComte recommending to us which 'Radiometric dating' method is preferable in his expert opinion...
Why don't you just take your samples to a lab and get them tested??
Now what would be the POINT of that?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
What would be a better start for such a process than a radiological test result from a "recognised" lab?
Originally posted by golemina
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
What would be a better start for such a process than a radiological test result from a "recognised" lab?
That's a REALLY good idea Aloysius!
Why don't you run along and do just that.
Still waiting to hear from the 4.5 billion years camp...