To anyone who thinks that people choose to be gay;

Did you choose who you were sexually attracted to? Or was it just there automatically?

That's what I thought........

Here is my opinion..

Our body runs off of it's eternal soul energy. If that energy is more feminine, it's by nature going to be attracted to the male energy. (opposites attract)

However, if the physical body is a male, but has more feminine energy, it would by nature be attracted to another male.

Every human being has both male and female genes/energy, which means males will always have some feminine energy within, it's just usually not strong enough to create a noticeable attraction to the same sex.

So to answer your question. If a male has more feminine energy, than non-feminine energy, they can't help the attraction. That attraction is no different than you and I have towards a beautiful female... They feel the same exact feeling and energy while looking at the same sex...

I hope this makes sense...

Originally posted by KingDoey
And he would kick my ass?! You don't even know me..

No. I know him.

Being homosexual is NOT genetic, it's environmental.

If people in your family are gay, you're not going to pass that along in your genetic makeup, but it kids grow up seeing adults of the same sex interacting in a sexual way together, then there is a strong possibility that they will emulate this behaviour.

After all, if being gay were genetic, then their parents wouldn't have had the heterosexual relationship that had the kid in the first place.

However, telling people that their "Gayness" is genetic absolves them of all personal responsibility from the choices that they made on the road to their being gay. Lady Gaga infuriates me, telling kids that "they should stand up and be proud that they're gay" and then in the exact same sentence telling them "it's not your fault".

If you're proud to be gay, take responsibility for being that way.

Sexual orientation is entirely environmental, and opportunistic.

I am in no way homophobic, having had a few encounters of my own and having many homosexual friends, but take some personal responsibility for your actions.

Originally posted by muzzleflash
It cannot possibly be genetic.

If it were genetic, than the geneticist eugenicists could easily develop gene-therapy to "Fix" them.
And that is silly, no matter how hard you try you will never stop people of the same sex from kissing each other. That would be virtually impossible and absurd.

The homosexual community better wise up, because they are shooting themselves in the foot here.

If they just admitted that it's a CHOICE, than they would not face these future predicaments because they have the LEGAL RIGHT to choose their own lifestyle.

But since they claim this has nothing to do with Choice / Freedom, and it's all about being "born that way" with genetic abnormalities or deformities, than I guess the gene therapists and eugenicists are going to have a field day. It's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when, and that time is quickly approaching.

Saying that homosexuality is genetic is not only incorrect, it's foolish and sets them up for a "cleansing".

edit on 29-4-2012 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)

edit on 29-4-2012 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)

This isn't a very good argument. First, scientist have not identified a "gay" gene. When and if they do, who will pay for the study that will require years to study the chemical affinities, isolate the gene and protein and then clone the gene out of the dna and monitor the mutations for years thereafter?

Who would be able to afford this "gene therapy."

If it's not a money making menace to society, like AIDS/HIV or cancer, lupus, or diabetes, big pharma isn't going to pay for the research.

Secondly, homosexuality does occur naturally in the animal kingdom. Since we are part of the animal kingdom, one must conclude that homo sapiens are equally vulnerable to homosexuality as any other species.

Originally posted by babybunnies
Being homosexual is NOT genetic, it's environmental.

If people in your family are gay, you're not going to pass that along in your genetic makeup, but it kids grow up seeing adults of the same sex interacting in a sexual way together, then there is a strong possibility that they will emulate this behaviour.

After all, if being gay were genetic, then their parents wouldn't have had the heterosexual relationship that had the kid in the first place.

However, telling people that their "Gayness" is genetic absolves them of all personal responsibility from the choices that they made on the road to their being gay. Lady Gaga infuriates me, telling kids that "they should stand up and be proud that they're gay" and then in the exact same sentence telling them "it's not your fault".

If you're proud to be gay, take responsibility for being that way.

Sexual orientation is entirely environmental, and opportunistic.

I am in no way homophobic, having had a few encounters of my own and having many homosexual friends, but take some personal responsibility for your actions.

Your whole post seems based on the premise that having gay sexual encounters is wrong and sinful. You know what, screw that. There will never be a shortage of babies being born, so if people are born gay, if they are gay by conditioning, if they are bisexual, bi-curious, experimenting, I say, more power to them. If men are banging each other, then they're not killing each other. Have at it!

Originally posted by RealSpoke
To anyone who thinks that people choose to be gay;

Did you choose who you were sexually attracted to? Or was it just there automatically?

That's what I thought........

edit on 29-4-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)

I quite deliberatly chose my husband. I even persued him. I saw him, I made a decision that I wanted to know him and made arragements to get to know him. Seems very deliberate to me.