It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The biggest conspiracy of all time!

page: 2
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 28 2012 @ 03:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheCelestialHuman
reply to post by mikefromspace
 





The actual universe is infinite as is time.

So are you saying the universe is eternal? i thought the big bang theory proved that the universe had a beginning, which was the big bang. if it had a beginning it was/is not eternal.. therefore, the universe is not eternal or infinite.


Infinity has a jumping off point....

2nd




posted on Apr, 28 2012 @ 11:15 AM
link   
OP?
could you please just for me define what is your conspiracy?
yes we all agree a universe exists
yes we agree protons collided in the LHC.

not seeing a conspiracy in your OP, so help me out, I need more to the story'
maybe its that I am new and dont know how it all works yet
edit on 28-4-2012 by racer451 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 28 2012 @ 01:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheCelestialHuman
reply to post by mikefromspace
 





The actual universe is infinite as is time.

So are you saying the universe is eternal? i thought the big bang theory proved that the universe had a beginning, which was the big bang. if it had a beginning it was/is not eternal.. therefore, the universe is not eternal or infinite.

In our Universe time is but one dimension. Time and space cannot be separated, thus the name spacetime. In our Universe time only started existing when space started existing. However, if the multiverse theory is correct, then separate time (to ours) exists in a higher realm..
edit on 28-4-2012 by rhinoceros because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 28 2012 @ 09:16 PM
link   
reply to post by UberL33t
 


Haha.. I should have 2 physics videos up. That is one (not the duck).
Given little thought most people should be able to visualize how each force works. If I can do this using mere projective geometry; what does this say about our so called "experts"?
It may not even appear to be much but spend enough time with it and you'll see... nature abhors the vacuum and sooner or later everyone will understand how everything has a natural way of falling into place, paths of least resistance. Well the subject is honestly too big for this forum. I'll see about showing my equations in a future video.



posted on Apr, 28 2012 @ 09:19 PM
link   
reply to post by sting130u
 


The big bang theory ; the bigggest mistake of all time.
There need be no expanding universe to explain both the thermal constant and cmbr redshift.
I explain this in one of the videos.video



posted on Apr, 28 2012 @ 09:27 PM
link   
reply to post by rhinoceros
 


Yet a jet with an onboard atomic clock proved that time can be hidden from during accellerated travel.
There are not only seven levels of timespace but we have already proofs that lightspeed is not a limit.
Fiber optic experiment ref. And speed of electron neutrinos or even tachyons. These simple things have long since disproved Einstein. Am I the only one following the news here?
Photons he even said were a shortcut : not reality. Einstein's last words; "Everything is relative." !!!!!!!



posted on Apr, 28 2012 @ 09:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by mikefromspace
reply to post by swan001
 


The solution to field unification... it's been solved by some to a degree I can explain only using some of the same projectively geometrical space



Woah, woah... You got me interrested, mate. Unified Theory? Please explain more on this field. What kind of geometry? Pythagore?



posted on Apr, 28 2012 @ 09:29 PM
link   
reply to post by mikefromspace
 


In that case, you should maybe collaborate with the members who are supporting the following thread, just a notion. If anything, you can get an idea of other members on ATS that may be able to easily understand your mathematical equations and add to or oppose accordingly to what your formulas suggest.


Yes This Is Another Thread Calling For A New Forum...But I Think It Has Merit!


And for us math junkies...we would have a place to review calculator functions, explore theorems, and generally challenge each other intellectually with stumping problems.



posted on Apr, 29 2012 @ 07:21 PM
link   
reply to post by swan001
 


My time is limited, fingers cold in this Starbucks makes typing hard but;
Geometry is absolutely non-absolute, ie; anything can be transitional having holographic memory, in that I mean :
say an atom made out of certain particles wants to move past light speed and back. Well some can, they will actually loose the quarks which made the atom's beginnings (3rd magnetic pole) while gaining more of a crystalline geometry upon the transition. Getting them back when dropping out of light speed... well that's something that need be done nice and slow near a star where you get all kinds of particles, quarks even, just not making matter yet until they find eachother.

As I think I was saying; the geometry is projective, based on triangles, the fano plane! Study HSM Coxeter's book/work, which was used by Buckminster Fuller to design geodesic domes. Later buckyballs were discovered, proving something about how things like to fall in place.

I'm sorry I can't answer everyone's questions right now, I can just refer you guys to my channel on youtube. Best to watch videos because they explain more than I could in months of typing here.



posted on Apr, 29 2012 @ 07:31 PM
link   
reply to post by UberL33t
 

I don't think it merits the creation of yet another forum here. It would be nice to have a particle physics forum yes, but not necessary. The truth is, I never obsessed over particle physics. I just got lucky, had some vision in 1995 on Christmas eve of how the universe should be, and it continued to branch for years into so much... eventually giving me insight to how I can design ufos, many diff techs. Tom Bearden told us about zero point energy working off nonlinear pump z waves when I read his paper from RexResearch. He had inside knowledge to what happened in the Philadelphia Experiment.

I've focused on this ufo physics all my life, since I was 20 and in the navy I began building a collection of odd papers, victor schaubager, plans for a drone ufo craft from a guy in Pakistan, etc..etc... this list is just too extensive to show here. Long story short; the cheapest way to build your own ufo in a garage with little money, I describe as the Ed Leedskalnin tech... the device that lifts stones can lift itself. You split up the +bias iron mass into 3 parts with 3 small motors in free spin instead of just 1. This gives you the framework of a triangle, a 'fano plane' if you will, not that it matters so much, but this shape would work efficiently and would be laterally maneuverable.
I just figure, if you're anybody who wants to do anything amazing in your life, you'd want to build and fly one of these suckers. Just follow the simple directions.. understand the science. I hope I can get to the point this summer where I can mass produce parts to make this machine... so anyone can make it... as long as neodymium magnet sales don't cease due to evil control we're all under right now. Next thing you know we'll all need a license to buy them.




top topics



 
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join