It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by RandomEsotericScreenname
reply to post by Stormdancer777
Funny you should say that.
The only constant throughout history is that the christians have been the prosecutors.
How I live my life? I'm not gay, I just hate intolerance, hypocrisy and stupidity.
Bullying you, lady please, it's not you I'm after, it's your statements.
edit on 29-4-2012 by RandomEsotericScreenname because: (no reason given)
Actually the early days of Christianity, yes they were persecuted.
en.wikipedia.org...
and in many countries today there is much persecution of Christians.
Perhaps the gravest under-publicized atrocity in the world is the persecution of Christians. A comprehensive Pew Forum study last year found that Christians are persecuted in 131 countries containing 70 percent of the world’s population, out of 197 countries in the world (if Palestine, Taiwan, South Sudan, and the Vatican are included). Best estimates are that about 200 million Christians are in communities where they are persecuted. There is not the slightest question of the scale and barbarity of this persecution, and a little of it is adequately publicized. But this highlights the second half of the atrocity: the passivity and blasé indifference of most of the West’s media and governments.
www.nationalreview.com...
It is not generally appreciated that over 100,000 Christians a year are murdered because of their faith.
I haven't made any statements that merit attacks.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by RandomEsotericScreenname
The comparison was of said holy book, not of extremists. Moderates also do not like being harassed and bullied. You are the one who imagined a retaliation of an extreme sort. I imagined a reaction of walking out. Or they may throw a shoe at him.
Why yes it does, it clearly states that being armed is a requirement for war. Ask a Marine how many different ways they have been trained to kill, and they may still come up short of possible ways to silence a person for good.
Originally posted by Climax
Originally posted by Wonders
Originally posted by Climax
Originally posted by RandomEsotericScreenname
reply to post by Stormdancer777
I am real in here.
Peacemaker? I am not at war, I'm in a discussion, just like you guys.
Thats not how they see it. You hear it all the time now, "The War on Christianity"
Another poster summed it up nicely early on in the thread, but Christians are whipping themselves into a frenzy, believing that there is a "War" on against them.
bing.com
war
1.armed fighting between groups: a period of hostile relations between countries, states, or factions that leads to fighting between armed forces, especially in land, air, or sea battles
2.period of armed fighting: a period of armed conflict between countries or groups
3.methods of warfare: the techniques or the study of the techniques of armed conflict
Synonyms: conflict, combat, warfare, fighting, confrontation, hostilities, battle
There is war in the world, justified or not. You seem to know a bit of the trade, intimidation is a tool, you use it well enough it just might work for your cause.
So you agree that it is rediculous to call it a war? There are no armed forces involved at all. It clearly states that being armed is a requirment for war.
Knowing how to read, it seems, isn't a requirment of being christian.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by RyanFromCan
Please do not let your sense of pride in your personal ideals let you believe you are a better Christian than others.
Dictating curriculum is not the same thing as screening presentations for possible foul language and such. But then I grew up when foul language was still considered rude. In the world of political correctness, why would a school faculty view such a presentation as appropriate? I gave a number of presentations for my degree in IT and not once did I think to myself, I think I will condemn a certain group of people and use foul language to get my point across.
Originally posted by RandomEsotericScreenname
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by RyanFromCan
Please do not let your sense of pride in your personal ideals let you believe you are a better Christian than others.
No it's more his applications of Christian values that make him so, from what I've seen.
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by RyanFromCan
Oh please, it's obvious to anyone that isn't an extremest left winger what they did. They saw me disagreeing with them, labeled me as a rightwinger, and attacked away. Same as the right wingers do when I happen to disagree with something they stand for....
LOL, partisan much? For your information, I am a Centrist, with Left leaning social beliefs,
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by RyanFromCan
So they can walk out as long as the point at which they walk out, or the reason they walk out is approved by you? So walking out is an example to you of hate ? I will try and remember that next time someone begins pummeling me with abusive language.edit on 29-4-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Grambler
Originally posted by Clearskies
Maybe some were running (actually walking...) from his bullying, because they weren't hardcore Christians and might've hurt the guy accidentally or on purpose?
Does anyone actually remember being in high school? I'm guessing the majority left because to them it was a stupid presentation and they were bored, and once they saw a couple people leave, they had an excuse to walk out.edit on 29-4-2012 by Grambler because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by RyanFromCan
Yes the first person did walk out right away. It took longer for the rest you know. But so what? I would like to know just how many rocks you expect me to allow you to throw at my head before I leave?
And oh please please leave off the personal discussions of ladies. It is exactly this which I am making the decision to ignore further posts by you as it is only more ridiculous attempts to justify Savage's approach.
Your post was totally tacky and so was Savage.
edit on 29-4-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)edit on 29-4-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)edit on 29-4-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)edit on 29-4-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
I do not even see why you guys are even trying to argue with HIM anymore. I do not call him a troll for the reason he thinks though.It is not to insult him either just to describe the actions and tone of his speech. I call it as such because he says things that are directly aimed at angering or insulting in the guise of debating so he can skirt the T &C rules.
Originally posted by RandomEsotericScreenname
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by RyanFromCan
Please do not let your sense of pride in your personal ideals let you believe you are a better Christian than others.
No it's more his applications of Christian values that make him so, from what I've seen.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by RyanFromCan
I understand that you are crusading for a cause you believe in, and in doing so you are judging fellow Christians at face value. In fact you are judging me as well. Your cause is jumping on a political bandwagon in my view. For this reason, I am going back to such writings as St. John of the Cross for a deeper reference than a current political cause du jour.edit on 29-4-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)