Ron Paul will destroy us all!

reply to post by Dasher


Alrighty then! We shall see.

Originally posted by Eavel
One problem, 50%+ of the population is on social benefits of various kinds.

The demoRats and Libtards have bought the popularity vote.

With EU crumbling, you have better odds of it all falling and starting from scratch than people having "common sense" and being "better people" most are just lazy and useless as they have no responsibility to support themselves any longer with this sopcialistic marxist POTUS

You mean 100% of the people. You know that internet, those highways and that public education are socialist tools used to ruin America. No free education, roads should all be private and tolled, and the internet should be shut off until some company reinvents it and only sell its access to the highest bidders. And while we are at it that Border Patrol is a Marxist tool to keep people out who want to compete in a true free captalists style they should all be let in and if Americans can not compete with the lower wages they should die in the streets and not be protected by socialist marxist laws that make life easier for them will wage limits and labor laws. Lets do this the American way.

reply to post by MrSpad


I do not understand your communication. It seems that it is sarcasm, but I don't like to think so poorly of someone who has taken the time to write so much. Conversely, if it is not sarcasm, I am not following your logic, will you, please, clarify yourself? And if it is sarcasm, could you state your point concisely, please? Thank you.

Originally posted by TheNamesZeppelin
Ron Paul cannot save this country...He can't save anyone for that matter.
The only way this country could change it's filth to worship of the True and Living God, Yeshuah Hamashiach.
But in my opinion, Amerika is New Babylon anyways....
Peace and Love from the Most High...

I think you've misunderstood. Ron Paul is a real person.


Cheers

If Paul don't get it, I'm going to the dark side literally. I will become as evil as my government, and play them.

reply to post by Plotus


As cheesy as it is: Be the change you want to see.
Otherwise, why would you possibly think that you deserve a better governing system?

Originally posted by NightGypsy
Wow, this thread seems like nothing more than a chat thread for anti-Paul shills, save but a few of you. You guys are talking so much nonsense I'm starting to think this is a hoax thread.

I agree. New ones have joined just to comment. Funny huh.

So, Op want to shed some light on this sarcasm as intended or a rubbish pot for trolollollllling?

reply to post by dreamingawake


I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are asking me. If you ask again, more clearly, I will be happy to respond.
Cheers.

Originally posted by Dasher
reply to post by dreamingawake

 

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are asking me. If you ask again, more clearly, I will be happy to respond.
Cheers.

I didn't understand your OP. Other people feel the same. Are you asking for trolls to come here? Or are you making a sarcastic statement about how people feel about Ron Paul?
Does that help?

reply to post by Dasher


woah woah I thought we were already on the road to destruction before Ron Paul.

reply to post by dreamingawake


Yes, it helps me to respond. I would suggest that you read my post multiple times if you did not "get it." I was very explicit with my intentions. I would appreciate your patience in understanding my post as I don't much appreciate criticism from the standpoint of confusion. However, if you comprehend my post, constructive and thoughtful criticism is very much welcomed.

reply to post by votan


Are you attempting to communicate something via sarcasm, or did you not read and understand my post?

Just as a note to others:
From "Idiocracy" -
"Unaware of what year it was, Joe wandered the streets desperate for help. But the English language had deteriorated into a hybrid of hillbilly, valleygirl, inner-city slang and various grunts. Joe was able to understand them, but when he spoke in an ordinary voice he sounded pompous and faggy to them."

I, generally, lump sarcasm in with the "grunts" when it fails to communicate something clearly/cleverly.

Originally posted by Dasher
reply to post by dreamingawake

 

Yes, it helps me to respond. I would suggest that you read my post multiple times if you did not "get it." I was very explicit with my intentions. I would appreciate your patience in understanding my post as I don't much appreciate criticism from the standpoint of confusion. However, if you comprehend my post, constructive and thoughtful criticism is very much welcomed.

I have been looking through it.
Also, I am not dissing you or anything. I am on your side with you are saying and thank you for that. I would just hate for this thread to turn further into pages of comments swaying the original conversation.

reply to post by dreamingawake


Sure, thank you.

The original topic, distilled, is;
If you ask for liberty, be prepared to carry the burden of responsibility.

Either we are headed for the bumpy road of progress, or we are headed for the bumpy road of regress. Either way, anyone who is "awake" needs to take an account of their needs/wants and act responsibly.

Havent went through all the posts.. but for all who really dont have a clear picture of the situation.. let's hope that this explanation helps

In all the early caucuses Ron Paul delegates were focussed on becoming elected and put on the slates for the convention. While Romney was chasing poll numbers, RP supporters were fighting for delegate and chair positions. this was completely successful in almost all early caucuses.. making it that RP delegates were in the severe majority. The poll numbers didnt matter as long as RP took a share in the polls no matter how small.

With this strategy, because Romney took the numbers in the polls it turns out that some of Ron Paul's delegates get bound to Romney from every state where it is said that they must vote for the candidate they are bound to in the FIRST round of voting. However thiey can 'abstain' from voting for the candidate they are bound to.

reply to post by 0mage


Firstly, your facts are wrong for nearly every state, and, secondly, your post is off topic. However, I would appreciate you continuing to read the thread and garnering some ideas to consider.

I have done my best to keep this message going, but I am content to let it now pass unless someone else causes it to return to topic with some momentum.

Thanks, folks!

Ron Paul will deregulate this entire country. Throwing it into chaos. I don't know how soon after, and I'm not sure if many of his supporters realize this. I for one, realize it.

If the fed ended today, it would be doomsday in America. It's the only way we are still living like we are. The fed also realizes the danger, they are really just riding it out until the wheels fall off. They understand it's too late.

And idk.. I support Paul because he wants to do things the right way, while the fed are pouring oil into a fire, possibly believing the fire will fizz out. It's not going to happen. We have to start somewhere, we can't keep doing this because it's affecting our military actions, therefore affecting the world.

We're going to go through hell either way when it's all done with. A revolution will come out of it once it the puzzle is put together and the blocks come tumbling down.

Let's be the country we were meant to be, not just for us but for our children.

reply to post by Dasher


And what Alphabet Agency do you work for???