posted on Sep, 28 2004 @ 10:36 AM
Originally posted by KhieuSamphan
Although I am anti-hunting I am pro free-speech and I am pleased to see that at last some group is willing to stand up and take their protests
directly to the government.
The reason for the whole debate on fox hunting is the fact that it is a cruel blood sport. Dumping dead animals into fountains and at railway
stations isn't the best way to protest their cause.
This quote from that article made me giggle:
Originally by Baroness Mallalieu
"The saddest thing is that we are seeing the police being deployed to protect the government from the people - and I never thought I would see that
under a Labour government."
These people don't pay much attention to civil liberties until it happens to them and then they're shocked by the way the riot-police handle things.
Welcome to the twenty-first century!
As for the argument that banning hunting is against their civil liberties, if that is the case then why can't I enjoy a joint in a pub?
The whole issue is just a fish thrown to the seals so that they can flap their fins at the great liberal and fair hand of Tony Blair's New Labour in
an attempt to hide the lies of WMD and the unjust wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. At the bottom of the article is this quote:
At the weekend Tony Blair suggested a compromise might be reached such as for hunting to continue under licence.
Two million anti-war protestors don't make a difference, but a couple of disgruntled hound keepers can move mountains.
[edit on 28-9-2004 by shanti23]