Originally posted by chaakin
Originally posted by Aliensun
Perhaps it is my deficiency, but I was unable to make any sense of the full article and its relationship to 9/11 which was my reasons for reading.
Being an American, I suppose that my failure to comprehend the imporance of that article is somewhat understandable.
I urge the OP to present a thread that explains the whole situation If he wants us to appreciate his "full answer.".
It's relative because 911 was orchestrated to combat the Saudi's giving so much money to this group, from what I can see. And maybe it's for the best,
what would a Palestine Terrorist group do with 1 billion? Wipe out Israel, and the USA needs Israel. Remember the Israeli company who's white vans are
on CCTV the morning before 911 occurred? Seems Israel had it's reasons to be involved too...edit on 27-4-2012 by chaakin because: (no reason
given)
Agree, as most of the hijackers were Saudi according to the official version the US could have turned the whole country into glass as a response but
instead they blamed Osama. Saudi Oil is too important and they were given another chance I guess
I have read somewhere in the past 3 members of the Saudi Royal family were executed shortly after for being invovled in some way which is another
little known fact however I have been very hard pressed to find any English article substantiating this.
I am of the opinion that 9/11 was a job which may even have involved many of the western intelligence agencies and Israel working together, perhaps to
frame Saudi thus ensuring they keep out of the subsequent war on terror and obviously funding the Palestinians. Due to the events mentioned in the Op
the British public were well indoctrined into believing there was a rise of extremism in Saudi prior to 9/11 - Newspaper says 15 Saudis on board
hijacked plane = case closed, until of course they re open it with the Afghan connection.
It has been said in the past that when you get to a certain level in Intelligence they are all the same anyway. The business interests, which is what
seems to be represented above the people often overlap.
Good point above from another poster about the knighthoods, however I think a lot of these honors are actually propesed by parliament. Bush senior was
awarded Order of the Bath, was that for his fantastic service as President or his services in the CIA for 30 years including JFK killing? I read
somewhere they call it the company as it has shareholders, can anyone elaborate on that if its not too off topic?
Also as far as I know the Royals have had no power since the Glorious Revolution where Charles I was executed, though the media paints a different
picture i agree. I am personally more for "Crown Corportation" ie the City. They would certainly have a financial motive for something like 9/11
happening. The origins of the City is a book in itself, Rome then later the Templars who if you remember had their wealth confiscated by I believe
James the first and given to the Knights Of Malta. All Bar associations are franchises of the Bar at the Temple Inn and The City, like Washington DC
and the Vatican are completely independent of their host countries.
Also considering the Saudi's own substantial shareholdings in most of the American giants such as AOL plus id suspect these airlines since they were
practically institutions, would they not have taken a pretty huge hit financially that day? Perhaps this was a warning - look how ruthless we are and
we are keeping the money we shorted you on, ps you ever # us around re Palestine again well tell the public you did it. PPS were going to recolonise
your neighbours and were opening a base in country.......
Thanks for taking the time to read the article, the above is kind of what I was thinking linking it with 9/11
I think there is a far bigger picture than we can see.
edit on 27-4-2012 by trustnothing because: (no reason given)
