Why do 2012 believers think that a new planet in the solar system would cause animal die offs?, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 27-4-2012 @ 09:25 AM by Chamberf=6
reply to post by stereologist



How are the two supposed to be connected? I just don't get it.

No big wonder why you "don't get it" -- it's all bs.

You are trying to make sense out of something completely nonsensical.

Don't expect anything logical, provable, or credible from the 2012 crowd.
edit on 4/27/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 27-4-2012 @ 09:28 AM by TheMindWar
reply to post by stereologist


Its not a weird notion really when you actually consider the facts. Let us consider the fact that scientists now believe that a huge planet exists on the edge of our solar system and the fact that the majority of solar systems appear to be binary systems. there is no reason why our system is not a binary system with a second sun that went supernova a couple of million years ago.

But that said, we are far more likely to kill ourselves with stupid technology like Nuclear power stations than a rouge body in the solar system.


reply posted on 27-4-2012 @ 09:34 AM by SpearMint
Originally posted by TheMindWar
reply to post by stereologist


Its not a weird notion really when you actually consider the facts. Let us consider the fact that scientists now believe that a huge planet exists on the edge of our solar system and the fact that the majority of solar systems appear to be binary systems. there is no reason why our system is not a binary system with a second sun that went supernova a couple of million years ago.

But that said, we are far more likely to kill ourselves with stupid technology like Nuclear power stations than a rouge body in the solar system.


That's completely different to one sneaking up on us and killing animals.


reply posted on 27-4-2012 @ 10:16 AM by samkent
reply to post by TheMindWar




Its not a weird notion really when you actually consider the facts. Let us consider the fact that scientists now believe that a huge planet exists on the edge of our solar system and

No they don't!
Only people on conspiracy sites do.


reply posted on 27-4-2012 @ 10:17 AM by Xcalibur254
reply to post by TheMindWar


Not true. At least not for our galaxy. In our galaxy current estimates place two thirds of all main-sequence stellar systems as being single, not binary.
Stellar Multiplicity and the Initial Mass Function: Most Stars are Single



reply posted on 27-4-2012 @ 10:25 AM by tracehd1
I think the Moon has a lot of different effects on our earth....the tides, gravitational pull...ect ect
Some say that the closer the moon is to our planet EQ can happen....


And...

Earth's Magnetic Fields May Be Causing Bird and Fish Die-Off

Read more at Suite101: Earth's Magnetic Fields May Be Causing Bird and Fish Die-Off | Suite101.com donna-pravel.suite101.com...

Large objects in our solar system effect us very much...it's a matter of physics.

Maybe most of you wouldn't b running your mouths had you done a simple thing called re-search...paying attention in school...instead of trying to make childish jokes and rolling your eyes at 2012... People think there may be a pole shif in 2012 ..and they've actually proven it has shifted ..... I wont tell you how much or how it happened, maybe you!ll look up the info on your own instead of embarrassing yourself.



edit on 27-4-2012 by tracehd1 because: Corr



reply posted on 27-4-2012 @ 11:32 AM by Mkoll
reply to post by tracehd1


If you had researched your source you would see that it doesn't point to a connection between an encroaching extrasolar mass and shifts in the Earth's magnetic field. So yeah

The poles will shift at some point be it next year or 10,000 or 10,000,000 years from now, that is not what we're arguing. We're arguing that the belief that Nibiru would cause animal die offs is nonsensical.
edit on 27-4-2012 by Mkoll because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 27-4-2012 @ 11:43 AM by stereologist
reply to post by TheMindWar


Its not a weird notion really when you actually consider the facts. Let us consider the fact that scientists now believe that a huge planet exists on the edge of our solar system and the fact that the majority of solar systems appear to be binary systems. there is no reason why our system is not a binary system with a second sun that went supernova a couple of million years ago.

But that said, we are far more likely to kill ourselves with stupid technology like Nuclear power stations than a rouge body in the solar system.

Maybe I'm being thick, but what does a huge planet 1/4 of a light year or further away kill animals?
How does being in a binary system kill animals?
How does a supernova a couple of million years ago kill animals now?


reply posted on 27-4-2012 @ 11:49 AM by stereologist
reply to post by BlastedCaddy


So you think that changes to the magnetic field would explain this.

1. Can instruments see the change?
2. Why are only animals in a small affected?
3. If the field is strong enough to affect animals here on Earth, then wouldn't we see the effects of the field on the magnetosphere and more importantly on the path of solar wind going in directions other than towards the Earth?
4. Shouldn't such a strong magnetic field be detected by satellites orbiting Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and Mercury?


reply posted on 27-4-2012 @ 11:56 AM by stereologist
reply to post by tracehd1


The Moon has been correlated with a few low intensity quakes. There is no correlation to strong quakes. No correlation has been found with the Sun and quakes.

People think there may be a pole shif in 2012 ..and they've actually proven it has shifted ..... I wont tell you how much or how it happened, maybe you!ll look up the info on your own instead of embarrassing yourself.

I think you are confusing a poleshift, a crustal event defined by Hancock, with a magnetic event. Ever since the magnetic poles were located, the position of the magnetic pole has been seen to wander.

So you think that the internal field of the Earth is the cause of the deaths. So why do so many people claim that animal die offs are an indication of a new planet in the solar system?


reply posted on 27-4-2012 @ 12:07 PM by stereologist
reply to post by crankyoldman


fun game, create your own straw man and then spend post after post debunking it. What are you even talking about "2012 believers?" There is no such thing, there are people who have an opinion about what this period in consciousness is all about, and some INDIVIDUALS have some interesting ideas of what might or might not occur, but your "2012 believers" isn't real. You've created a group, which might consist of three or four people and attempted to make a policy driving force that must be stopped.

I referred to those that believe something special will happen in 2012 as 2012 believers. I really don't care what you think is an appropriate name. Why don't you suggest one.

What is really fascinating is your odd effort to continuously debunk something you already don't believe in. The obsession with "all 2012 believers are stupid, wrong, morons who just don't understand anything" would be funny if it was so sad. Hours and hours, hundreds of posts, trying to convince people of something you already believe. Why? Go for a hike, learn piano, your views should be listed as a sticky on the 2012 forum: stereologist does not believe in 2012 and neither should you because he says so. This would free up so much more of your life.

I am curious as to why people think that animals dying is indicative of a new planet.

Apparently you have nothing to say about the issue.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Pane andov - expected cosmic events in 2012-2013
  Posted 8 days ago with 9 member flags
Near Earth Asteroid Sept 14 2012
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags
Let\'s take a look at the PoleShift/PlanetX doomsayers, shall we?
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags
2012 Is not the End.
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags