Copied with full permission from the author to change or add links, comments as I see fit.
Full article can be found here: www.pacinlaw.org...
Added several links to further your understanding on a given section or comment.
INCOME TAX! DO YOU VOLUNTEER? ©
Authored by LB Bork firstname.lastname@example.org PRELIMINARY BRIEFING
• Heavy progressive Income Tax. Plank 2 of the Communist Manifesto, 1848
This author has been in the “freedom movement” since 1994; in this short period of time I have had vast experience of working with several groups
around the American union. The matter which has given me the most insight to the situation that we face is a meeting that I was privy to. This meeting
took place between an attorney that I was working with in 1998 and one Jeff Dickstein. For those people not aware of who Jeff Dickstein is, from
time-to-time he has been known to collaborate in income tax cases with the renowned patriot attorney Larry Becraft. In the aforementioned meeting of
which Mr. Dickstein had with the attorney, Mr. Dickstein stated: a case that he was working on at one time, the federal judge assigned to the case
pulled him into his chambers for a private meeting. In said meeting the judge advised Mr. Dickstein that his legal positions—constitutional and
otherwise—were correct; however, the truth was it was a political matter and he (the judge) could not take such positions under advisement.
This is when I started thinking: Everything that anyone does in matter of arguing the Internal Revenue Code is basically futile. There had to be some
other thing that was going on here. What is going on here is just what the judge stated: It’s a political matter! I acknowledge that there are some
Americans that have prevailed in their tax matters by using due process or deciphering the tax code, however that does not mean that it will work
every time. If one comes up against a judge that wants to take silent advisement of what is done by you under the 14th Amendment political system: it
either will or may not matter—custom and usage doctrines will prevail, which may include committing an act of treason against your state of right,
due to 14th Amendment offers—such of which may include the judge taking silent judicial notice and he deeming you to mandated servitude pursuant to
the new 13th Amendment for your criminal activity: voting. You then are duly convicted “silently” by the judge for such activity. You may be
asking yourself. . . How can he do this? Well, one could say that jury trials are a privilege under the 14th Amendment governmental/political system.
If you do not believe it. . . it is asked: how many times has a judge overruled a jury and passed his own judgment? The juries appear to be just a
dog-and-pony show to trick people into thinking they have the same system of law that was held under the original constitutional system prior to this
amendment. In regard to the parameters of these undetermined matters, the Internal Revenue Code has been effectively set-up to allow this. Below
evidenced is some of what I speak:
• Title 26 USC § 3401(a) Definitions-Wages. For purposes of this chapter (Chapter 24 - Collection of Income Tax at Source on Wages), the term
“wages” means all remuneration (other than fees paid to a public official) for services performed by an employee for his employer, including the
cash value of all remuneration (including benefits) paid in any medium other than cash; except that such term shall not include remuneration paid. . .
Who is an employee? That is defined here:
• Title 26 USC § 3401(c) Definitions-Employee. For purposes of this chapter (Chapter 24-Collection of Income Tax), the term “employee” includes
an officer, employee, or elected official of the US, a State, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or
instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. The term “employee” also includes an officer of a corporation.
The former mentioned appears to preclude the average American; however, this is how they have covered themselves to include anyone they want:
• Title 26 USC § 7701(c) Definitions-Includes and including. The terms “includes” and “including” when used in a definition contained in
this title shall not be deemed to exclude other things otherwise within the meaning of the term defined.
So, what does this really mean? It means that anyone can be included that THEY feel should be included. In another instance, it has been ruled by the
Supreme Court that the term “income” refers to the profit of a legal entity after all the operating expenses have been deducted. If this is true,
why is the following item incorporated:
• Title 26 USC § 61. Gross income defined. (a) General definition. Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income
from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items: (8) Alimony and separate maintenance payments.
One should ask, since when is marriage, or the effects of the termination thereof, deemed a business item which can be taxed? What business has
alimony payments? This leads one to believe that the opinion of courts cannot be trusted, does it not?
That simple fact of the matter is, if you are a United States citizen who is participating in the Fourteenth Amendment governmental system you may be
subject to—or included under—the doctrine of Public Policy, or some other doctrine that is taken under secret advisement. Yes, government playing
a false god does have its costs.1
1 He who receives the benefit should also bear the disadvantage. [Cujus est commodum ejus debet esse incommodum] This is a maxim of common law.
And again, I understand that some “in the fight” may be slipping by; however, there is a chance in playing with the “Grey Area” in these
matters. If a judge—as similar to the aforesaid—is possibly a devoted fan of Karl Marx—or takes into consideration any obscure doctrine or rule
of law—you will undoubtedly lose. I make this claim out of what has transpired throughout the past how many years I have looked at this issue. There
is no telling what these “people of station” may pull out of the infinite “bag of tricks” to deem Income you liable for the tax. The only true
remedy is that of removing yourself from the body politic (i.e. the political system) that has been deviously and stealthily created by and under the
unlawfully installed Fourteenth Amendment.
In regard to these matters: I cannot emphasize enough what the Supreme Court stated just after the implementation of the infamous amendment in U.S. v
“The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government. . . .he owes allegiance to the two
departments, so to speak, and within their respective spheres must pay the penalties.”
And by participating you will pay the penalties. . . Many have the past 130+ years.
This article covers some of the issues in mention—after reading it, hopefully you will comprehend why things go the way they do in Income Tax
matters. And, please note in advance: I apologize for not being wishy-washy like the U.S. courts have been since the 14th Amendment has been
instituted—for I am not on the payroll ;~)