It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by adigregorio
reply to post by adigregorio
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...
Let's see, would forcing the filmmakers to stop making this film establish religious beliefs....um yeah...
That would establish the law that it is wrong to talk about Jesus in a bad light. Which would imply that the government thinks Jesus is real...which they can not due do to seperation of church and state.
The only circles I see are the faux thorn crowns trying to be worn in here.
PS:
This discussion is not about me, though in order to "win" the discussion you would have to make it as such. The facts are written on hemp paper, stored in Washington DC. Just because you believe something, doesn't mean everyone else has to believe it. And no amount of imposing will change that simple human nature fact.edit on 4/27/2012 by adigregorio because: Postscript (Anyone else think it odd that the Christians are constantly berating the non-believers, wasn't that something JC hated with a passion?)
Originally posted by adigregorio
reply to post by Stormdancer777
Honestly, this is what happens when morals are imposed onto others.
They are making a film, slapping Christianity for imposing their rules on them. (My opinion there)
PS: I quoted the first ammendment, but we all knew that didn't we
Originally posted by adigregorio
I can not see any other reason for this, since if you are gay then by default JC is gonna have a little bit of a bland taste for you. Being all luke-warm and the like...
(Seriously, Jesus wasn't gay but I sure am gay for Jesus!)
The body of Christ, all muscled and toned, the body of Christ, I sure wish I could call it my own. -- "Body of Christ" Eric Cartman
So making a film about something that doesn't meld with your life, well either you are making satire or you are making enemies. In this case, it will be a bit of both. They are poking fun at this to get some satisfaction at the other side having to squrim. (My opinion)
Originally posted by rickymouse
It does not fit in with anything in the bible. In a case like this the Christians ought to be able to sue the filmmaker for slandering their faith. There is freedom of religion in this country, not freedom to slander religion.
They are poking fun at this to get some satisfaction at the other side having to squrim.
and he spend all his time around men
so, to get back on point, yes, he did have contact with women.. but the majority of his time was around men.. better for you?
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
These people would be in fear of death had they proposed a gay Mohammad.
I can't say that I am a hundred percent sure that Jesus wasn't gay, but how would Jesus gain respect amongst the straight people of his time if he was gay? People of his time would have talked about others the same way as people do now.