This Blog Post was written by someone else. I took somethings out and made it more modern. The guy who wrote this is apparently at least 20 years
older than me.
Over the past few [days], since I’ve announced my support for Mitt Romney, I’ve been subject to a barrage of verbal abuse from my conservative
friends. In fact, at times I’ve been tempted to scuttle away while screaming, “I am not a sell out, I am a human being!”
I have decided not to scuttle along and accept the insults and derisive comments which have been directed toward me. Why? Because - I'm right! Yes,
I'm right again.
As i've stated previously, Mitt Romney has the best chance of defeating Barak Obama! Newt Gingrich will [drop out May 1], Ron
Paul will lose [and retire at the convention], and the rest of the candidates [have already dropped out.]
But, again, why Romney? For those of you who don’t realize it - Mitt Romney is conservative. In fact, he is VERY conservative. Many people refer to
him as moderate and some even ridiculously refer to him as a liberal Republican - nothing could be further from the truth. Since when is a candidate
who believes in lower taxes, smaller government, secure borders, energy independence, a strong military, federalism, and conservative
Supreme Court justices
- considered to be moderate or liberal? I challenge anyone to point to anyone of his stated policies which indicates he
is liberal or moderate.
Also, for those of you who don’t realize it - Mitt Romney is an outsider.
He has never worked in Washington DC, he is not a
darling of the Republican establishment, and he’s certainly not a friend of the liberal establishment. I’ve never seen an example of him receiving
or giving political favors from or to any Washington insiders. I challenge anyone to provide an example of how Mitt Romney has benefited from his
inside the beltway political relationships. [Has he spent over 30 years in congress?] Not that I can see.
Additionally, for those of you who are easily manipulated when the words “flip flop” are applied to conservative politicians by the liberal media;
isn’t it okay to flip flop if your new position(s) is/are conservative? Personally, I’m glad Ronald Reagan flip flopped from the Democrat to the
Republican party. I’m glad Bill Clinton flip flopped on welfare reform and signed the Republican welfare reform legislation. I’m glad Barak Obama
flip flopped on Guantanamo. On the issues Mitt Romney has allegedly flip flopped on - has he changed from conservative to liberal positions or has he
become more conservative?
If my comparing Romney to Reagan is tempting you to use the line, “I knew Ronald Reagan, Ronald Reagan was a friend of mine...Mitt Romney is no
Ronald Reagan” - I have a few points. Mitt Romney is as conservative as Ronald Reagan!
Yes, I said he’s as conservative as
Reagan! On issue by issue - Romney is as conservative as our own Ronaldus Magnus!
Now, let me tell you one more way Romney is similar to Reagan - Romney doesn’t scare moderates or independents. That’s right, it’s important for
conservative Republicans not to be scary. Why? Because the liberal media WILL demonize the Republican candidate and try to make people think he or she
eats children. I remember very clearly how the liberal media tried to demonize Reagan when he ran for the presidency in 1979. Why didn’t it work?
Because when people watched and listened to Reagan they could see he was a decent guy - and they ignored the media. In the same way, Romney doesn’t
scare people; he’s a nice guy and so it will be difficult for the liberal media to demonize him.
Sorry, but I need to make this next point, because it’s critical for conservatives to accept. It is very easy for the liberal media to demonize Newt
Gingrich. Why? Because HE LOOKS EVIL! Newt, although he might be the nicest man in the world, has a face which (with a little help from the liberal
media) will give children nightmares. [Ron Paul looks like your crazy uncle. Would you trust your crazy uncle to rule the world, if you didn't know
anything about him? Rick Santorum looked too much like a preacher man. Bauchmann sincerely looked like a crazy witch. And finally Herman Cain was a
black republican. He would NEVER appeal to the majority of the country.] Yes, it’s sad but true, looks do matter in a presidential election.
Okay, back to my Reagan comparison. Another way Romney is similar to Reagan is how he can articulate the conservative message. When you listen to
Romney explain and defend his positions on the issues it becomes very apparent he has a deep knowledge and understanding of the issues. For some
unknown reason it has been a challenge recently for Republicans to nominate candidates who can speak in complete sentences. Do you remember how George
H.W. Bush mangled the English language? Do you remember how George W. Bush mangled the English language? We should be thankful the Democrats nominated
two morons when GW ran - Gore and Kerry. Do you remember how John McCain articulated conservatism? No? Neither do I - because he couldn’t. Romney,
on the other hand, has a deep grasp of why conservatism is the best political, economic, and moral philosophy - and he does an excellent job defending
it. I will concede that Romney isn’t Ronald Reagan when it comes to giving a speech; but, there was only one Ronald Reagan - nobody has ever given
better political speeches than Reagan.
So why am I supporting Mitt Romney? Is it because I’m a sell out to the conservative cause? NO! It’s because Mitt Romney is the most articulate
Republican running for president. It’s because Mitt Romney is an outsider who has no ties to Washington DC and the Washington DC political
establishment. It’s because he’s the MOST conservative and most importantly he will beat Obama - and end this nightmare called the Obama
Words in  brackets are my own added material: kenhand.blogspot.com...