Milwaukee Red Cross Told To Prep For Chicago Evacuation During NATO Summit

reply to post by burntheships


Oh, I almost forgot that our tax dollars and labor unions have also helped fund it.

Can't forget about them.

reply to post by cavalryscout


Oh, FEMA is involved too. Remember all of the tents?
www.prisonplanet.com...

reply to post by cavalryscout


If I were to speculate, it would be a possible terrorist attack or assassination attempt. That would get the left fuming mad. But thats speculation of course.

Originally posted by cavalryscout
Why would the red cross get involved? I would think it would be more of a situation for FEMA.

I thought the red cross usually responded to natural disasters. I'm holding with my prediction for an earthquake to hit Chicago during the summit.

They will use haarp to trigger a major earthquake. That is why there have been all of this strange stuff happening in Clintonville, Baraboo, Watertown.....all in Wisconsin. Earthquakes in Wisconsin when is the last time that happened? Recent news reports, like a few days ago, of strange noises in Ohio and some river nearby had a ton of dead fish.

I'm not sure of a motive...... just plain crazy I guess.

I hope I'm wrong!

I was going to mention those weird booms everyone has been hearing up that way, but you beat me to it!
I have a hunch it has something to do with those. No scientific group has come up with an explanation for the sounds although anyone who goes to those places will hear them. We shall see!

You know, it's not like this is the first major world conference of very controversial organizations in the modern age?? I don't get this. Why Chicago?? They KNOW..KNOW..this is going to bring major problems and far moer headaches than any benefit for whatever city hosts it?!

I'll give the Bilderbergers this much...At least they and the other usual suspects tend to choose their locations out and apart from MAJOR Metro areas where life for millions will be turned upside down so they can have a meeting. Why does NATO have to just stomp into town and damned the disruption to an entire city..and by this story,..an entire region??

If they're trying for unrest and to create a situation which then demands a crackdown, I'd give an A+ for effort. They aren't missing much for chances to see it develop.

reply to post by lilowl53


There was an old Edgar Cayce prediction that America would turn to socialism, the Great Lakes would empty out through the Mississippi into the Gulf, splitting the US in two, WWIII would break out and Russia would become the light of the world. But I digress.

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
If they're trying for unrest and to create a situation which then demands a crackdown, I'd give an A+ for effort. They aren't missing much for chances to see it develop.

Yep. No doubt about it. However, you do have my curiosity up,
yes...just why did they choose Chicago?

Originally posted by cavalryscout
Why would the red cross get involved? I would think it would be more of a situation for FEMA.

Because the red cross has been providing humanitarian aide to victims of injury in the midst of wars battles and other forays for well over a century now throughout the world. Which means they are well practiced and prepared for such activities where as fema is not.

Maybe this is why the G-8 summit was moved to Camp David (May 18-19)?

www.wgntv.com...

reply to post by burntheships


Why have it in Milwaukee? Have it here in Upper Michigan, there aren't enough people to do an evacuation here. All they would have to do is pay for some fireworks in Marquette and give out free hotdogs and brats with beer there and half the UP would be in Marquette. They could have the summit in Munising. That is a cheaper way to do things. Well, I suppose they could have the summit in Munising without creating the big party, but I like the big party idea better

Originally posted by thehoneycomb
reply to post by lilowl53

 

There was an old Edgar Cayce prediction that America would turn to socialism, the Great Lakes would empty out through the Mississippi into the Gulf, splitting the US in two, WWIII would break out and Russia would become the light of the world. But I digress.

Edgar Cayce also predicted Atlantis would rise next to Cuba in the 60's.

But I digress.

Foretold the discovery of the land from Atlantis

Cayce revealed that new land will appear in 1968 or 1969 off the east coast of North America, the so-called "rising of Atlantis".

It was in that timeframe that the Bimini Road was discovered in the Atlantic Ocean. Whether this is actually a road or natural, geologic erosion is being hotly debated. Many people believe this to be the actual portion of Atlantis that Cayce was referring to.

Cayce maintained that Atlantis was an ancient civilization that was technologically superior to even our own and that its last surviving islands have disappeared somewhere in the Atlantic ocean some ten thousand years ago.

Cayce revealed that the size of Atlantis was equal to that of Europe, including Asia in Europe. He saw visions of this continent of the past which had gone through three major periods of division; the first two occurred around 15,600 B.C., when the mainland was divided into islands. The three main islands of Atlantis Cayce named were Poseida, Og and Aryan.

He said the people of Atlantis had constructed giant laser-like crystals for power plants, and that these were responsible for the second destruction of the land. Cayce blamed the final destruction of Atlantis and the disintegration of their culture on greed and lust. But before the legendary land disappeared under the waves, Cayce revealed that there was an exodus of many Atlanteans to ancient Egypt. Cayce attributed the Biblical Great Flood of Noah to be a result of the sinking of the last huge remnants of Atlantis.

During Cayce's otherworldly journeys, Cayce would often reveal the past lives of those who would come to him for information concerning their health. A number of people who came to Cayce were told by him that they had past lives in the legendary lost land of Atlantis. In fact, Cayce revealed that a vast number of souls who lived past lives in Atlantis have been incarnating to America for a long time now to usher in a new era of enlightened human consciousness. In all, Cayce referred to Atlantis no fewer than seven hundred times over a span of twenty years.

The NATO Summit has been declared a National Special Security Event by the US Department of Homeland Security. This places the US Secret Service and FBI in complete control. They trump Chicago PD in any situation that arises in the area surrounding the summit.

The undercurrent is very clear with regards to Chicago. It all begins May 1 apparently. They are trying to recruit as many people as possible to attend. Talk about a captive audience. Pardon the pun...

This will be a zero tolerance event. Just a friendly warning. All eyes will be watching...

reply to post by jibeho

Thanks for the friendly reminder on that. On a lesser event, heck..Chicago is half a day's drive for me and I rather got to like protesting after last year's experiences. As you note though, Chicago in May isn't for protesting, it's for street fighting and that isn't my cup of tea of change. They can keep the whole pot, for that matter. I'll see about catching the next one....

Looking up at the rifles of the Secret Service as they looked down on us..and through scopes...was enough to see once with a protest 3 blocks from last years World Series games. I sure don't need a repeat performance to appreciate your meaning of '0' tolerance. Can 0 be capitalized? lol

Originally posted by burntheships

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
If they're trying for unrest and to create a situation which then demands a crackdown, I'd give an A+ for effort. They aren't missing much for chances to see it develop.

Yep. No doubt about it. However, you do have my curiosity up,
yes...just why did they choose Chicago?

Chicago has a Mayor (Rahm) who is willing to play the game. Rahm took office in Chicago in May 2011 and Obama announced the NATO Summit location in June 2011 while giving a speech on the troop reduction in Afghanistan.

reply to post by jibeho


Ok, yes that make complete sense.

How could I forget about Rahm?

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
You know, it's not like this is the first major world conference of very controversial organizations in the modern age?? I don't get this. Why Chicago?? They KNOW..KNOW..this is going to bring major problems and far moer headaches than any benefit for whatever city hosts it?!

If they're trying for unrest and to create a situation which then demands a crackdown, I'd give an A+ for effort. They aren't missing much for chances to see it develop.

Just like the G20 a couple of years ago, in Toronto. Look how much unused space we have up here, and yet, they chose the largest city in Canada, and held the meeting downtown. Millions of dollars in security costs that would have been unnecessary if they held it almost anywhere else. Plus, there were massive riots.

They could have held it in a swanky yacht offshore, for way less than what it cost.

I also give an A+ for effort. They do a good job at disrupting people's lives. I can't think of any other reason to choose the busiest, most well known cities, other than to create complete chaos.

Hey I have an idea. Can we get some of ATS'ers to check and see who filed for permits in the city of Chicago during the summit? Oh wait never mind...google search takes care of that.

www.morrisdailyherald.com...

CHICAGO (MCT) — After weeks of disagreement, the city of Chicago and anti-war demonstrators have settled on an alternate route for a protest march on the first day of the NATO summit in May.

The city on Wednesday granted a parade permit to the Coalition Against NATO/G8 War and Poverty Agenda that will begin at the city’s preferred location — outside the Loop — but will venture into the busy State Street corridor before heading south to McCormick Place convention center where world leaders will hold their meetings.

Protest organizer Andy Thayer said his group was satisfied with the alternate route for that Sunday, May 20, and would accept the permit so they could begin to publicize the specifics of the event.

However, Thayer said the city has yet to answer the protesters’ demand that Chicago officials back them up if the U.S. Secret Service tried to curtail the route to keep protesters out of “sight and sound” range of McCormick Place for security reasons.

City officials could not be immediately reached for comment.

The protest group wanted to start at Daley Plaza, but city officials said a large demonstration in the narrower and more crowded streets of the Loop would pose an unacceptable public safety risk at a time when about 50 foreign delegations are likely to be moving through downtown in heavily guarded motorcades.

City lawyers argued last week that demonstrators have a right to march but not a right to cause gridlock in the city.

Protesters argued that the city has been inconsistent and disingenuous with its treatment of their permit application. The Department of Transportation had approved a permit for an identical march the day before, May 19, when that was going to be the first day of the G-8 summit. But after President Barack Obama moved G-8 to Camp David, Thayer filed a new application to move the march back one day.

City officials defended the route change by saying that NATO would draw more delegations — and more traffic congestion — than G-8

So just a few quick observations here.

The NATO summit moves to camp David? Does it start in Chicago and then move to Camp David?

Also Daley Plaza? That sounds like Dealy Plaza? You know where JFK got shot.

Nice find, Who know whats going to happen. Things are getting so out of hand around the world, it only a matter of time before the people snap and start riots in the streets. hope you all have your BOB's