reply to post by thorfourwinds
And we congratulate you on your wordsmithyness...
Ah, yes... there is always a however, isn't there?
Perhaps you are not completely familiar with all the facts.
On the contrary, all of the significant and relevant facts are known to me.
Your attempt to establish a correlation between 'fear mongering' and the fact that Fukushima Dai-ichi has been spewing radioactive particles
24/7/365 for over a year is questionable
Hardly.... You have about 4,000 becquerels of radioactive particles inside your body at this very moment (potassium-40) and the decay energy of
potassium-40 is actually greater than that of Iodine-131 and Caesium-137.
Not to mention the fact that "Spewing Radiation" is a dimensionless assessment, kind of like saying "There is water coming this way"
Sure, a Tsunami is dangerous, but a rain shower is not.... so when you say "Spewing Radiation" and do not provide any information about how MUCH
radiation is coming out, I get a little suspicious.
to put it nicely, if not outright disingenuous
So, you see, you are wrong there.
and an obvious attempt to establish a strawman argument
And here... in which you clearly do not understand what a strawman argument is, in addition to your statement being wrong.
regarding sales of uranium to Iran, which you allude to but provide no verifying links or any other information.
That's interesting... I thought that the links that I provided to the stories about japan offering to sell enriched uranium to Iran were fairly
conclusive in regards to my statement that Japan offered to sell enriched uranium to Iran.
But, perhaps you merely missed them, so here they are again:
You see, about 6 months before the "Incident" at fukushima, Japan offered to refine, and sell commercial grade uranium to the nation of
So, as you see, I'm having a little trouble comprehending EXACTLY where you think you get off, saying what you are saying.....
But, perhaps you couldn't access the links I provided, or you think that they are questionable sources of information, so I am providing corroborative
sources for this story:
There, is that enough links for you?
Perhaps you would be so kind as to check out any number of our signature threads so as to gain at least a working knowledge as to what is
really going on with the greatest environmental challenge mankind has ever faced.
Perhaps you would like to explain how releasing a statistically insignificant quantity of radioactive material into a biosphere as large as the
Earth's, which is already saturated with orders of magnitude more radioisotopes than your piddling little "Drop" called fukushima is releasing,
qualifies as "THE GREATEST ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGE MANKIND HAS EVER FACED"
Because, honestly, I would like to know exactly how you would go about qualifying and justifying that statement as anything other than the hyperbole
that it is.
First, good luck on proving that (1) Mossad "carried out the whole operation."
Yeah.... I know what you mean... they *ARE* pretty sneaky, aren't they?
Do you intend to prove that Mossad caused the earthquake?
Yes, well, something along those lines.
Nuclear weapons buried along a fault line can have that effect.
Any proof please, as we think that is one of the possibilities that needs to be included in any definitive analysis of this
Ironically, the only proof one would be able to gather, would be radiation readings from the site.
Again, some sort of proof, and some qualifying links to support your assertion that you know what "they," in particular, want...
They want all nations to be under the yolk of the international central banking cartel... I would have thought that this was obvious to all with
Honestly, this IS a conspiracy site... did you not read any of the previous threads since the sites inception?
edit on 27-4-2012 by ErtaiNaGia because: spelling