It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Originally posted by QQXXw
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
reply to post by Tifozi
None of what you posted is true concerning vulnerable warships.
A nuke would have to land literally right on the deck of a carrier to sink it, anything less and it still floats.
Torpedoes wont sink it and the other ships are only there to protect the carrier, it they take damage it is by design.
You really are brainwashed if you believe a carrier can withstand a nuclear strike
A carrier is already extremely vulnerable to conventional torpedoes or anti ship missiles, a nuclear strike would obliterate it
edit on 26-4-2012 by QQXXw because: (no reason given)edit on 26-4-2012 by QQXXw because: (no reason given)edit on 26-4-2012 by QQXXw because: (no reason given)
I said sinking the carrier, and yes it will not sink unless a nuke is detonated on its deck. NK can't hit the broad side of a continent with a missile, it has zero chance of hitting a single ship in a massive ocean.
You are naive if you think anything that launches a torpedo would survive getting in range of a carrier.
China is, and they appear to be in violation now. The young dictator ratted them out by showing the chassis.
None of what you posted is true concerning vulnerable warships.
A nuke would have to land literally right on the deck of a carrier to sink it, anything less and it still floats.
Torpedoes wont sink it and the other ships are only there to protect the carrier, it they take damage it is by design.
What makes you think that the North Koreans depend on food aid from the U.S when China and Russia are literally next door with plenty of food ?
We have no real Idea why the U.S is giving food to north Korea, they could certainly get it much closer to home without any trouble.
In rocket science you don't get lucky, you get it right or you don't.
They don't have the massive expenditures of the size economies the Soviet Union siphoned from or that of the US. Many more mini Kims will come and go before they expend enough to get it right, or they go belly up trying.