posted on Apr, 26 2012 @ 11:16 AM
reply to post by Destinyone
Yes I know, I was just stating that I've seen far worse homes of people with less children than her. The fact that the taxpayer pay's for this
brood, or the fact she attempts to scratch cash by flashing her flesh is none of my concern, neither do I pity her, yeah she bought it on herself and
all that jazz..
I do wonder what effect the blatant and rabid bastardisation of this woman has on her children as they grow and am rather alarmed at the notion that
people would willingly see these children, who to all intents and purposes must love each other, split up.
From what I've seen in other reports her floors look quite clean, the home though sparsely furnished doesn't appear to be a complete dump (other
than the odd spray paint) and the children seem well nourished and quite content. Boy's wearing girls clothing? I'm not at all shocked at the
prospect of hand me down clothing or a boy wearing pink given the circumstance, just to think of the accident's and changes of clothes kids get
through whilst potty training, just getting them washed and changed is more important than whether they end up with a barbie on their shirt.
I don't see her hanging out with any dead beat abusive boyfriend, I just see a woman that didn't make a great decision in her life to begin with and
when faced with the prospect of aborting all but one, couldn't bring herself to do it, I can't exactly say I blame her for that.
Yeah the hairdo thing is outrageous, and she's going to get flack. But how is she all that different to the other thousands of women who spend their
childs fathers maintenance money on a fancy hairdo and nice nails every week?. I'm sure she isn't throwing THAT kind of money on the back of the
fire at a whim like some women do. As for the hairdresser, she should get her own fair share of scorn and derision, what person in their right mind
would take that sort of money off someone in their home and then bandy the tale around to the highest bidder?.