posted on Apr, 26 2012 @ 06:25 PM
Hi face like the sun, your comment "Compare that to the likes of Christianity, or even Islam, that actually has historical significance behind
Wow, you refer to a tailer about something that has clips of people's opinions and compare it to ...... a couple of monotheistic religions that are
based on ........ faith?
They have absolutely no solid PROOF! Ancient aliens is put together as entertainment I'm sure, but their visual footage still begs the question how
did some of those marvels actually happen? Lets face it, 1000+ ton blocks "lifted" into place at Baalbek? Massive blocks of irregular shapes placed
together at many sites around the world that can't have a knife blade pushed between them? "ornaments" from the past that when sized up actually
fly? Stone with "internal" angles carved to micrometer specs? and the list goes on.
The argument that "don't underestimate the ability of humans from the past" is so lame IMHO, as why didn't such insight from these so called
ancient humans translate into a much more sophistocated culture and why isn't there more proof of their supposed advanced abilities? What IS there,
leans away rather than towards clever humans.
A comment on religion being credible? C'mon, the giant floating toaster in the asteroid belt is as plausible as many of the statements spouted by
I try to have the opinion that sure, let everyone have their own take on life, but it just bugged me that massive unknown structures and heaps of
other really interesting evidence like the stone carvings resembling modern technology (eg face in what appears to be some sort of helmet, complete
"protective suits" etc) The part of the clip showing the person sitting with hands in positions and what looks like foot on a peddle (like a motor
bike peddle) is just as plausible as some of the far fetched stories in books like the bible.
And talking of the bible, since the religion bit that you mentioned caused me to respond. How come this is supposed to be, the be all and end all,
when at least the first 5 books of the old testament are really only a very brief summary of tens of thousands of documents (well really clay tablets)
from Sumerian and or Akadian times (these clay tablets aen't just :I believe stuff, they are real "flesh and blood" (SIC) items Added to this, the
new testament is a compilation of writings that was put together by a roman leader and his bunch of religious leader floosies who decided on which
past writings would make up the new testament according to what would suit THEIR agaenda of the day (and the OTHER writings of the time were put to
the side or worse, destroyed so they could have no further adverse influence on the plans of TPTB at that time). Add to this, disgusting behaviour of
the puppets of the clergy destroying almost all evidence of a culture over in South America under the "justification" of it is not of "god" and
the pathetic destruction of cultural (to say the least) history when both the christians AND the muslims had their individual "15 minutes of fame ...
(well really it was infamy wasn't it)" by destroying the library at Alexandria just BC and then again just AD. How pathetic!
So, if you feel like bagging out Ancient Aliens, may I suggest you not build your arguments on the shaky ground of dogma.
It's a crying shame that pathetic, primitive dogma and hopeless powermongers of the past have managed to rob people of today of what our past was
Respectfully (with absolutely no animosity to you)