I don't understand, I'm further confused by this.
The general states that there is a probability of threat, not an actual threat as they actually don't know of the capabilities of Iran or NK.
What they DO know is that these two countries are immensely unprepared to deliver nuclear warheads at long or even medium distances and do not have
the technological know how, in order to produce an actual nuclear war head.
Which has been confirmed time and time again by the American-Israeli and UN talking heads.
How is this "opinion", without facts, somehow indication of fact?
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation nor does truth become error because nobody sees it."
edit on 4/25/2012 by tothetenthpower because: (no reason given)