reply to post by EyesWideShut
So let's see.. You've made Judgments about my morals and ethics, implied that I was anal retentive, and implied that I was Anti-American.
where did I say those things about you?
TROLL stay on topic and stop making crap up. you know people can just click and see for themselves. You are the only person to insult anyone.
All while going on a "The President is Hitler and a dictator and this is the second coming of the Nazi's" tirade. You've authored "9/11 was our
Reichstag Fire" and have the majority of posts in the " All Aboard the Auschwitz Express" thread. Your "America is the new Nazi Germany" wet dream is
interfering with your capacity for rational thought.
you disagree with me...ok. I have presented facts about the American/ Nazi industrialists that associated with Nazi leadership. This was news and is
archived in the library of congress. This you can check for yourself.
I made a thread about the similarities of 9/11 and what happened in Germany.....so what!?!
"My wet dream" what are you 12?
Then you have the audacity to be outraged at the fact that I called you a "Liberal" & "Neocon" . C'mon man.
until you respond to my question about why you tried to troll me, I won't respond anymore to you. You seem to want me to PM you. Are you realizing now
that this is not going so well for you publicly?.....I don't have the audacity of doing anything. I can't be a NEOCON and a LIBERAL since ideologies
like that don't mix. You need a dictionary. That was an attempt to get me to respond emotionally. Want to derail this thread much? just because people
disagree with you?
I didn't call you anti American. Please show me where I did. You admitted to saying those things to try and get a response out of me. Please look up
the definition of internet troll. You tried to derail this thread instead of talking to me. Since I don't agree with your view you try to insult me.
TRY. Instead of engaging me in dialogue to learn. You want sock puppets that agree blindly with you, just like shills. are you one? Your behavior is
not your best defense.
I am glad you spent hours reading my posts and threads. Thank you I am honored. Every post I made in this thread was on topic. The problem is you are
just a dumb animal that needs something to shoot for your brain to kick in.
There I insulted you. Now we are even. and both off
You admitted to trying to derail this thread by trolling me. All for what? Because I disagree with you?
You must be a delight to live with and have around.
No matter what you type, people see truth...
I think we've both derailed this enough, if you want to continue , you can IM me. So Long...
Yes people here are attune to trollish and shill behavior. You are the reason ATS has so much trouble winning back the faith of its members because we
just don't know anymore. People like you come here to do damage and push their point of view. Not engage in intelligent conversation. You had many
opportunities to respond to me with respect. You decided to act like a child instead of thinking.
my point is this.
consent of the PEOPLE suppose that there is a kind of original contract by which the subjects have tacitly reserved the power of resisting their
sovereign, whenever they find themselves aggrieved by that authority with which they have for certain purposes voluntarily entrusted him.
while presence in the territory of a society may be necessary for consent, it is not consent to any rules the society might make regardless of their
content. A second condition of consent is that the rules be consistent with underlying principles of justice and the protection of
natural and social rights, and have procedures for effective protection of those rights (or liberties).
This marine was in his mind speaking out about his leader who he thought failed his nation. He was not on duty and did not do so as a marine. He did
so as an American. The mentality of silencing someone critical to the great leader is reminiscent of Nazi Germanys sudden censorship of dissent. That
is why I brought it up. I have been reading allot about it and it is what I can offer. I am sorry if you don't approve but you don't decide what I
People quoting the facts about the contract he signed are correct. The marines possible MO could have been one of invalidity IHO. The contract might
not have been valid to him for some reason. I don't know. He may see his censorship and punishment as an infringement of his rights and that is why he
chose to become an example. Who knows.
According to the will theory of contract, a contract is not presumed valid unless all parties agree to it voluntarily, either tacitly or explicitly,
a supposed social contract cannot be used to justify governmental actions such as taxation, because government will initiate force against anyone who
does not wish to enter into such a contract. As a result, he maintains that such an agreement is not voluntary and therefore cannot be considered a
legitimate contract at all
edit on 27-4-2012 by BIHOTZ because: (no reason given)