It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
SAN DIEGO — A sergeant will be discharged for criticizing President Barack Obama on Facebook in a case that called into question the Pentagon's policies about social media and its limits on the speech of active duty military personnel, the Marine Corps said Wednesday.
Sgt. Gary Stein will get an other-than-honorable discharge and lose most of his benefits for violating the policies, the Corps said.
Sgt Gary Stein will receive an other-than-honourable discharge for violating a policy that limits speech of military service members, the Marine Corps said
Prosecutors said Sgt Stein repeatedly ignored warnings from superior officers, and that the postings were in breach of military regulations.
The US military has a long-standing policy of restricting the free speech of service members, including criticism of the president, who is commander-in-chief of America's armed forces.
Sgt Stein's supporters - who include two congressmen, and the American Civil Liberties Union - argued that the defence department's regulations are vague, and that commanders do not understand them. .
The US military has a long-standing policy of restricting the free speech of service members, including criticism of the president, who is commander-in-chief of America's armed forces.
Sgt Stein's supporters - who include two congressmen, and the American Civil Liberties Union - argued that the defence department's regulations are vague, and that commanders do not understand them.
Originally posted by schuyler
It's not over til it's over. There is an appeals process. I don't know if he can pull it off in such a politicized environment, but if he was an otherwise exemplary Marine, it might be possible.
Originally posted by paradox
I'm a recently discharged Marine myself, and what this Marine did, although I agree with him, is in violation of UCMJ Article 134. The conduct of the accused was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
Originally posted by 200Plus
From day one in the military they tell you " you defend the constitution, you are not defended by it". A soldier sacrifices his constitutional rights and gains the rights under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
This guy swore an oath to obey the orders of President of the United States and then said he would refuse to honor that oath.
Originally posted by 200Plus
I don't think my opinion matters but................
As a veteran with 21 years of service (including 42 months of combat and 48 months of non-combat deployments), I say he got what he deserved.
From day one in the military they tell you " you defend the constitution, you are not defended by it". A soldier sacrifices his constitutional rights and gains the rights under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. While many of these rights are the same, some are vastly different.
What this ex-marine did was say he would "refuse the orders of Obama". While I hate Obama with a passion (most liberals actually hahaha), he is the president of the United States at the moment. This guy swore an oath to obey the orders of President of the United States and then said he would refuse to honor that oath. What is a soldier without honor?
No, he got what he deserved and he should have known better, but that's just my opinion.edit on 25-4-2012 by 200Plus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by longjohnbritches
Originally posted by paradox
I'm a recently discharged Marine myself, and what this Marine did, although I agree with him, is in violation of UCMJ Article 134. The conduct of the accused was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
hi par,
Thank you for your service to the MOST free country in history.
So are you saying (and I know not where you pulled that 134 from so quick) that a mercenary has no freedom of speech??
Enlistment Oath.— Each person enlisting in an armed force shall take the following oath:
"I, XXXXXXXXXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."