Confessions of a "Paid Shill", page 8


Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 59 times


reply posted on 26-4-2012 @ 09:31 PM by mugenginga
Ah, an Occam's Razor fan!

I don't agree with your thought that we should go with the most mundane explanation as an automatic. That being said, I do think we should go with the one with the best evidence backing it up... which in the case of most things, does happen to be the mundane one. However, in some cases the mundane evidence and the "alternative" one have fairly equal amounts of weight behind them - and in rare cases, the alternative has more grounding.

For example, the existence of aliens is one that, in my opinion, has more alternative backing than the other. The only evidence we have for that is one interpretation of events in history and the percentile heavy unlikelihood that we're alone in the universe. Neither of those are what I'd exactly call hard science (although the latter leans further towards it than the former). I don't think its the exception to the rule, and its for this reason I'd argue against mundane being automatic.

However, I do agree that a large portion of the believers I've seen will kick anything mainstream to the curb. You're hardly what I'd call the opposite of that - you seen willing to at least weigh the possibility of the alternative option. Rather than that making you a disinfo agent or a shill, I'd say that simply makes you a good critical thinker. It also makes you not that different from a person who believes and will go for the alternative choice in a gridlock.

When nothing further can be debated, one has to pick a side. I don't fault you for picking one side over the other! Us in the believers camp could probably use more skeptics!


reply posted on 5-6-2012 @ 10:32 AM by Anunaki10
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
During that time I've been called a lot of things but the most common are things along the line of paid shill and disinfo agent.

You need to point out where someone called you "paid shill" and "Disinfo agent"... In what thread(s) did they call you that ? Please point out *thread name*, *Page* and >reply posted on *day-month-year* @ 03:21 PM by *ATS member name*<

These fringe topics will never gain any kind of legitimacy as long as people will jump on every video of an orb or every rock that looks like Sasquatch as proof of the unexplained.

What fringe topics are you refering to? And can you prove footages of Sasquatches are fake?

Let's take the recent MIB video as an example. All we have is two men in black suits entering a hotel lobby and the word of a man who has changed his story over time.

You mention a man who changed his story over time... What story are you refering to? How did he change the story? And who is this man?

This is something that should have been thrown out right away but instead it is still being argued over.

There may be a good reason why it is still being argued over and over again... What make you think it should have been thrown out?

So why do we spend all this time arguing over something that doesn't matter?

It obviously does matter...
www.abovetopsecret.com... ATS member 'DJW001' who made this "Aerial Phenomena Research Team recruits hoaxer" thread obviously don't know what 'DJW001' is doing, because it is wrong to call that case a hoax when 'DJW001' can't prove it...
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Are You Offended??? SO WHAT!!!
  Posted 9 days ago with 97 member flags
The Image of Baphomet: Upsetting Folks Since 1855.
  Posted 9 days ago with 39 member flags
New Scientific Report Destroys Global Warming!
  Posted 7 days ago with 32 member flags
Al Azif: Is The Necronomicon Real?
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags
What The Hell Is This?
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags
How copyright enforcement robots killed the Hugo Awards
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags