It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FORMe2p00p0n
.and once the Sumerian texts are confirmed, it would confirm that we were created as a slave race to mine gold.... oh wait we still mine gold and stock pile in just a few places around the world.
the all powerful spiritual "god" of Moses does not make sense, a flesh and blood "being" with technology predating our current tech by 100,000 years does..
*looks at watch* - wonder when they are going to pick the shipment up
Originally posted by dplum517
Originally posted by Baalam
Originally posted by Dextraphite
reply to post by Baalam
Watch the entire series and visit Steven Quayles website. It gives a lot more information, and it is not JUST about ONE occurrence that was a hoax. Sure, there are many hoaxes, but also many valid accounts. This is not just based off of one occurrence.
Allow me to reiterate, I don't need to watch the entire series because in the first few minutes alone there are clearly doctored photographs.
Here's an article with more pictures.
It is mathematically impossible that these creatures existed, in accordance to the square-cube law. I believe giants are possible, but you're simply regurgitating false information.
Uhhhggg .... Using National Geographic to debunk something is no good. Sometimes photos are faked for a very useful purpose ...one being ...to discredit the context of whatever is in the photo.
They are pretty good at mixing truth with fiction. They lie. Just like every other mouthpiece for a government.
Our current use of mathematics is not the end all for everything. And using the word "Impossible" just doesn't sit well with me.
Dinosaurs existed on this planet for a long time. Seems to me they had no problem existing even though they were and still are the biggest creatures to roam planet earth.
Soooo...believing that a 12 foot Human or biped can exist isn't that far out.edit on 25-4-2012 by dplum517 because: (no reason given)
do you actually mean they won't fund research into something for which there is no proof ever existed?
Originally posted by CaptainLJB
Go here for the BIG STORY about the Smithsonian cover-up of Giants:
Interesting page Here:
Lots of dead guys Here:
Even if we throw out a bunch of weak sources, such as myths and fairy tales, there's still a ton of data out there which supports the existence of Giants.
And just between you and me, it's always been a fantasy of mine to make love to a 12' woman...
Originally posted by lupr3
reply to post by CaptainLJB
But what about Baalbek? Take a look at those foundation stones. Those stones were cut and then moved. Some weighing up to 1,500 tons... My father is an engineer. and i showed him about Baalbek. I didn't bring up any theories, but simply asked him how it could have been done. I still haven't gotten an answer from him on that.