It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by old_god
They don't even mention Ron Paul on UK TV, only Mit and Newt whatever his name is.
Originally posted by Shamall
reply to post by SeventhSeal
He is clearly talking about adults who get infected due to living the type of life style that makes them more susceptible. He says NOTHING about children born with said diseases.
I wish people would stop constantly taking what Ron Paul says out of context to use it against him.
Noam Chomsky: Obama is a man of absolutely no principles.
What are your thoughts on President Obama?
He’s involved in war crimes right now. For example, targeted assassinations are war crimes. That’s escalated quite sharply under Obama. If you look at WikiLeaks, there are a lot of examples of attacks on civilians.
What did you think when he was given the Nobel Peace Prize?
Considering the history of the Nobel Peace Prize, it’s not the worst example. It was given to him before he had the time to commit many war crimes.
Is there any point in us being in Afghanistan?
We wouldn’t have asked in 1985: “Is there any point in the Russians being in Afghanistan?” The fact is that the invasion was a crime. Then comes the question: “Is there any point in continuing?” But that presupposes legitimacy. Putting aside questions of morality and legality and simply asking about the goals of the US government is a very narrow consideration.
Noam Chomsky has said, "I’m not a great enthusiast for Obama, as you know, from way back, but at least he’s somewhere in the real world." He stated that the 2012 candidates are "Off the International Spectrum of Sane Behavior."
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
Romney 838 + Gingrich 141 = 979
Ron Paul 88
Watching Paul-tards claim he's still going to win the nomination: priceless