posted on Apr, 24 2012 @ 09:49 PM
Originally posted by DeadLights
reply to post by SplitInfinity
Agreed sounds like something I used to preach. Thats besides the point anyways reason I replied to you was to show you a bigger picture you may or may
not be privy to.
We are the quantum level! Not exactly the one as to say the only one. And we cannot percieve our reality as such. But we are quantum. Just living
within atoms that are within an object of multiverses that are making up multiple dimensions until you get to the bigger picture!
Question are we inside a hard drive? Or a biological brain? Chew on that one a min.
OK...I agree to one point...the part about DIMENTIONALITY. Each Universal State...whether it be a Universe where there are Physical Laws such as our
own or if it is a Divergent Universal State connected to our Reality that continually branches out in infinite combinations based on probability of
Cause and Effect...each Universal State within Infite Universal states within the Multiverse...has some Universes being of a Higher Quantum
Connectivity to other Non-Divergent Universal States that are part of our Universal Realties Tree within the Multiverse.
The Multiverse has many Trees...our Reality is but one tiny branch of one of those trees. Other Trees within the Multiverse are based on another set
of Physical Rules and have little connection to our tree with the exception of a Higher Order of Geometry.
Thus...there may be many different versions of me and you...but there is also Universal Realities where that Multiversal Trees Divergent Universal
Realities will not allow for our existance and perhaps not even the existance of Celestial Bodies or even a Macro-Universal State.
I once had a debate with Michio Kaku as I am in a Touring Band now in the Studio and I lead a somewhat Celebrity life although this was much more
prevelent in the 80's. So...being signed...I have to go to 4 Mandatory CD release parties a year usually in NY or LA. I met him in LA and usually
these parties bring out the MORONS WITH MONEY...I was pleased to meet him and talk to him. I got him a bit tipsy which he says he usually does not
drink...I don't believe that...but he was surprised that someone there could speak to him on his level. I have a higher IQ than him and he asked why
I did not go to MIT...I almost did. Anyways...we talked about my idea that it was Probability that directed Quarks to be close or at Maximum in number
in number if there was a High Probability that an evet would happen...and a Lower number of Quarks present when the probability was lessor for an
event or action to occur. He said it was the first time he had ever heard of the idea but it beared merit...I kidded him...I better not see you
publishing a Paper on this without my name on it. We had a GOOD TIME! Split Infinity