reply to post by SplitInfinity
SI: If you would just research what diseases like these will do to a child and weigh that against VERY SAFE and PROVEN standard innoculation...the
risk of harm to your child from the shot is miniscule compared to the risk of infection. And for those of you who do not know...A VIRUS IS NOT ALIVE!
It is a snippet of a Molecular chain of aminoacids or DNA that only reproduces once it penetrates a living cell. Since it has DNA...it Mutates and
changes to be able to exist. A Bacteria is a LIVING ORGANISM...and it has DNA and can reproduce without a host.
I apologise for the length of this post, but there is so much more to this than what you've stated.
There is an even stronger statement dating back to 1990. A scientist in the field writes, "The present concern is for safety of vaccines made using
transformed or neoplastic mammalian cells that may contain endogenous contaminating viruses or integrated gene sequences from oncogenic viruses. There
is also concern for use of plasmid vectors employing promoter elements from oncogenic viruses. The principal concern for safety lies with retention of
residual DNA in the vaccine, especially since induction of cancer is a single -cell phenomenon, and a single functional unit of foreign DNA integrated
into the host cell genome might serve to induce cell transformation as a single event or part of a series of multifactorial events. Current proposed
standards for vaccines would permit contamination with up to 100 pg [picograms] of heterologous DNA per dose. This is equivalent to about 10(8)
‘functional lengths’ of DNA. Total safety would seem to require complete absence of DNA from the product." (31)
Please note that 10(8) means 10 to the power of 8, or 100,000,000 "functional lengths" of DNA are allowed per dose of vaccine. Is there something
wrong with this picture? How long will the general public be subjected to these vaccine products that according to this information, are nowhere
It has taken, for instance, approximately forty years for the scientific community to finally acknowledge that we have a serious problem as a result
of the contaminatio n of polio vaccines with simian virus 40 (SV40) in the late 1950s-early 1960s. There has been previous evidence of some human
brain and other tumors containing this virus (32, 33), but the medical community has been slow to acknowledge a definitive link between SV40 and
cancer in humans. However, two independent research teams have recently found this virus present in 43% of cases of non-Hodgkins lymphoma (34, 35).
Another study found it present in 36% of brain tumors, 16% of healthy blood cell samples, and 22% of healthy semen samples (36). And strangely, SV40
has now been found to infect children (37). Considering that children of this era, are not supposed to be receiving the virus via the vaccine
contamination route, this would therefore imply that SV40 is being transmitted from one human to another, in ways not previously known.
Other simian viruses may also be contaminating the (Vero) monkey cell lines used for vaccine production. One example from the literature cites the
contamination presence of SV20, which is a oncogenic simian adenovirus (38).
Simply put, are we in a state of denial that vaccines are ultimately transmitting viruses, DNA, and proteins into humans from foreign animal sources
(and possibly unhealthy human sources), and that this may be strongly contributing to the incredible upsurge in cancers and serious chronic diseases?
Are these foreign animal genes altering your DNA? Furthermore, given that viral presence can sometimes take years to manifest actual disease symptoms,
and then considering the tendencies of health-related agencies and corporations towards short-term solutions and profits, will we ever truly know the
long-term consequences until it is too late?