posted on Sep, 27 2004 @ 05:09 PM
while the article is interesting, I find it odd that they think the terrorists will attack prior to the election in an effort to get people to vote
for kerry. Everyone seems to think that another attack will result in a bush landslide. So much so that people actually think bush will order an
attack disguised as a terror attack so as to insure his victory (please don't start talking about how he did the first one too, this thread isn't
about that nonsense).
If the terror masterminds watch and read the news as much as everyone says they do, they should know that a terror attack before the election will
force them to deal with Bush and his minions for another 4 years. Also, the group has announced they are backing Bush so any assistance in fueling
the terror fears might help push bush (great, got the song in my head now) over the top.
Personally, I think another attack will come after the election, regardless of who wins. If it is Kerry, he's going to have to try and show
compassion and understanding and be sensitive to the terrorists cause as he walks thru the rubble of the dead. If it's Bush, well, he'll storm thru
the middle east and at that point, nobody is going to stand in his way.
What I also find odd about the article is that they have "determined" the likely targets. The Empire State Building, The Citicorp building (damn
them - one is two blocks from my office, the other is two blocks from my home), the Sears Tower etc.
What kind of computer models do they need to figure that out? The Citicorp building was named as a major target, the Empire State Building is back as
NYC's main symbol and the Sears Tower is, well, the Sears Tower. A giant penis in the sky is a target. Plain and simple. That aspect of their
report made the rest seem a bit less ominous.
Also, the group has announced they are backing Bush so any assistance in fueling the terror fears might help push bush (great, got the song in my head
now) over the top.
[edit on 27-9-2004 by Crakeur]