One of the many inconstancies of ATS, If I quote Michael Scheuer talking about what a ridiculous idea it is that Bin Laden was a CIA agent or
debunking a 9/11 conspiracy myth everybody starts ranting about how “he would say that, cause he was in on it.”. Yet as soon as he says something
you like such as “Obama=bad, Paul=good” you all lap up what he has to say and all of a sudden his political analysis is bullet proof because he is
telling you what you want to hear. Its absolutely insane that this is massive inconsistency is tolerated and actively encouraged by so many on ATS.

