It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by die_another_day
Anyone here now how long it would take to wire a floor of a building such as WTC7 with explosives?
To me it seems as if the bombs were placed before the planes struck.
On April 13, 1970, New York City issued restrictions on the application of sprayed thermal insulation containing asbestos. The use of BLAZE-SHIELD Type D was discontinued in 1970 at the 38th floor of WTC 1. The asbestos-containing material was subsequently encapsulated with a sprayed material that provided a hard coating. A green dye was added to the encapsulating material so that the asbestos containing SFRM could be identified. Thermal protection of the remaining floors of WTC 1 and all of WTC 2 was carried out using BLAZE-SHIELD Type DC/F, a product that contained mineral wool (glassy fibers) in place of the crystalline asbestos fibers. On the basis of tests, it was reported that the thermal properties of BLAZE-SHIELD Type DC/F were equal to or "slightly better" than those of BLAZE-SHIELD Type D"
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by bobs_uruncle
Problem with your mathematic masturbation.....
Only one building contained any asbestos - the North Tower (WTC 1). And then only lower 1/3 of building
up to 38 th floor . In the 30 years since asbestos containing insulation was banned in NYC (1970)
the asbestos was removed or encapsulated to prevent it was flaking off
On April 13, 1970, New York City issued restrictions on the application of sprayed thermal insulation containing asbestos. The use of BLAZE-SHIELD Type D was discontinued in 1970 at the 38th floor of WTC 1. The asbestos-containing material was subsequently encapsulated with a sprayed material that provided a hard coating. A green dye was added to the encapsulating material so that the asbestos containing SFRM could be identified. Thermal protection of the remaining floors of WTC 1 and all of WTC 2 was carried out using BLAZE-SHIELD Type DC/F, a product that contained mineral wool (glassy fibers) in place of the crystalline asbestos fibers. On the basis of tests, it was reported that the thermal properties of BLAZE-SHIELD Type DC/F were equal to or "slightly better" than those of BLAZE-SHIELD Type D"
Originally posted by Weeeden
This may be completely absurd, but is it possible that the building was built with a set purpose, with explosives already in place as they went? I don't have a clue how old they are, but it is a vague possibility!
Another option is that it could have been done in stages over the years, different construction/repair projects throughout the buildings..
The wiring could have had alot of chances to go in. Maybe someone should check the remaining buildings for wiring that shouldnt be there.edit on 21-4-2012 by Weeeden because: (no reason given)
Larry what's-his-face did insure for buildings for terrorism insurance 6 weeks prior to 9/11
In its court papers, Swiss Re shows how Silverstein first tried to buy just $ 1.5 billion in property damage and business-interruption coverage. When his lenders objected, he discussed buying a $ 5 billion policy. Ultimately, he settled on the $ 3.5 billion figure, which was less than the likely cost of rebuilding. His lenders, led by GMAC, a unit of General Motors, which financed nearly the entire cost of the lease, agreed.
Originally posted by Cassius666
Too many variables are involved. If you hire a demolition company and they have to gut the building take out the windows etc. 2 weeks, maybe more? If you hire enough people who know how to plant explosives and hire so many each has to plant only 2 to 4 charges, maybe a couple of hours.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by Cassius666
Too many variables are involved. If you hire a demolition company and they have to gut the building take out the windows etc. 2 weeks, maybe more? If you hire enough people who know how to plant explosives and hire so many each has to plant only 2 to 4 charges, maybe a couple of hours.
Yeah, you could just advertise for 800 evil NWO demolition experts in "Evil NWO Demolition Expert Monthly".
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
Terrific, that's all you got? I find it so funny that one little point is meant to discredit a complete operation, of course that's the way disinformation works. The most important things are, they could have gotten the buildings wired during evening and night shifts in 60 days or less, Larry what's-his-face did insure for buildings for terrorism insurance 6 weeks prior to 9/11 and of course he also had a pair of white elephants that were costing him megabucks in maintenance. Oh and he was also a friend of GW Bush. Seems like a few too many linkages there for me? That simple glaring "fact" remains, the buildings were taken down, not by airplanes, but demolition crews.
Oh and btw, my math was for illustration purposes only, at least I took the time.
Cheers - Dave
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by Cassius666
Too many variables are involved. If you hire a demolition company and they have to gut the building take out the windows etc. 2 weeks, maybe more? If you hire enough people who know how to plant explosives and hire so many each has to plant only 2 to 4 charges, maybe a couple of hours.
Yeah, you could just advertise for 800 evil NWO demolition experts in "Evil NWO Demolition Expert Monthly".
Here's an actual expert in this exact field.... he explains exactly what is involved, and that he knew from day 1 that WTC was a CD.....