posted on May, 22 2012 @ 03:20 PM
reply to post by ownbestenemy
"You are quite the little tyrant aren't you? You didn't post to discuss your idea(s) -- you posted to decree your word as such and we just need to
You are not adding to the thread, you are just trying to subtract an divert. And, even when you come up with ideas, as I said in the previous post,
they are too general to be of any use and might as well not have been stated. This is why I don't want you posting here. If you had posted
suggestions as to additions to my paper or corrects, or if you had posted ideas on your own dynamics to be included in a new constitution, I would
encourage your posting, but you have shown your true character - as has your buddy - and I care none for it.
"Where is the Constitution insufficient?" Did you read the original post or were you too busy drinking your "adult beverages".
"And if the point is to specifically say it is, then why ask others to come up with something anew? " Are you serious? The very conclusion leads to
the need to come up with it anew. I am not saying constitutions in general are insufficient - at least not here.
"Should each state in the Union not have their own Constitutions and only rely upon a National one? "
I am not saying states should not have their own constitutions and why would you even ask this question?
If I don't respond to your posts from now on, it is not that I can't or that your (ownbestenemy, Jean Paul Zodeaux) points are so valid as to stifle
me, it is that I don't find responding worth my time. And if any moderators think this is too much of a calling out or decorum violation, why don't
you read "Jean Paul Zodeaux" posts and see they are just more wordy attacks on me? In which case, I'd have you delete the whole lot of my and their
posts altogether, as they add nothing to the thread
edit on 22-5-2012 by capob because: (no reason given)