posted on Apr, 21 2012 @ 01:56 PM
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
Now if only you weren't made to look like a fool in the threat you started, where your assertion that a 60ns lag would make neutrinos appear
slower (making them 120ns faster than light) rather than faster.
You really think that you made me look like a fool? Seriously?
Did you ever get the schematics for the neutrino detector like I asked you at least 3 times? Or were you just going to forget that part about you
asserting that you knew how it was all connected?
Were you ever going to address the fact that a loose optical cable won't produce a 60ns delay?
Or were you ordered to just try to attack my "Credibility", as opposed to refuting my arguments?
You were wrong then and you are just as wrong now.
That's a nice baseless assertion that you have there, did you have an argument to back that up?
The neutrinos did not move faster than light, and this will be put to rest when they conduct their final experiment.
Oh, so you ADMIT that the final results are not in, and yet you still claim that you know the truth of the situation?
That's really funny there...
As far as dark matter goes, it may very well not exist, it's very theoretical, or it may exist in ways they don't understand yet. Very
interesting times we live in, I look forward to where this leads us!
Backing off of Relativity already, eh?
You are quite the fickle one, aren't you?
edit on 21-4-2012 by ErtaiNaGia because: (no reason given)