posted on May, 2 2012 @ 05:59 PM
Originally posted by Gazrok
Brings up a good point though...following that logic,would they make childlike robots for pedos? Would that be guilt-free, because it isn't real?
Personally, I'd have some issues with that, and I'd morally want to see such robots not be allowed. However, where there's a niche, it will be met,
even if it has to go underground.
Worse yet, would any activity with said robots then desensitize someone enough to then want to enact depravity on someone real?
So far, I see a lot of "cons" with this idea (sex robots) and no real benefits that can't be met with existing stimuli....
I had to let a mod go there for me. But yeah.
I'm all about the privacy and the freedom of expression....but at some point, does the larger society have a vested interest in limiting activity
that "isn't hurting anyone.."
What about a guy who pays for concentration camp robots, so he can dress up as a Nazi and "kill" them?
What about a guy who pays to have "slaves" dressed in Antebellum attire, so he can be a cracker and rape, lynch and kill them?
What if that sort of "play" became fashionable among wealthy high school students?
How does society respond to the idea that "if it isn't hurting anyone, then it isn't anyone's business?"