reply to post by Spirit Warrior 11:11
A very well defined piece. I wanted to reply to this specific post here due to a project I took part in about twelve years ago. This was a qualitative
attempt to study a number of phenomena associated with what could very broadly be called altered states of consciousness.
There were a number of subjective experiences that the sponsoring organization wanted to apply the latest real time brain imaging techniques, to
determine if there was an identifiable neurochemical-physiological artifact.
These controlled studies involved everything from fMRI's (to detect variations in the brains EM signature) and PET scans (the later for monitoring
neurotransmitter activity and location). Samples of NT's and other factors were taken from cerebral spinal fluid, as well as advanced physiologic
monitoring. A lot of the later methods including thermal facial imaging, 3D capacitance and blood circulation patterns are used in advanced polygraph
technology. Many behavioral associated "signatures" are defined in a certain diagnostic manual. Many of these experiments were conducted in
compartmented EM isolation rooms to reduce any ambient electro-magnetic noise to a minimum.
Among phenomena studied was the palpable sense of presence, of "someone or thing else" so often reported in UFO close encounters, in particular
"bedroom visitations" and could this same effect be artificially induced (it could), remote viewing experiments, and changes associated in deep
meditation and musical creativity (what was called music visualization). The most ambiguous results were from the RV's, which I took part in along
with what we called "Please remain calm you know its a test so don't make a fool out of yourself" The UFO thing, and despite knowing it was not
real it sure felt like "something was there", and by the way I never had a real or "raw" CE.
We had a series of people with varied skills that were and this is important, reproducible, and using a number of (drug free for the record, as were
all the studies) bilocation techniques. The "ambiguity" was in that though there were noted variations in perceptual and CNS activity associated
with RV activity, it was unique in its signature to each individual, at least as to the imaging and signal patterns recorded. The common factor that
was to one degree or another that showed up in all activities, including RV, was a decreased overall metabolic rate, similar to moderate meditation.
Also a tendency to access the "mind awake body asleep state" to varied degrees.
This is obviously a "learnable" skill but like many skills, it just comes more effortlessly for some then others. I was contacted because of my
atypical perception to RV targets, when taught a method in the 1980's. The basic technique did not come at all easily for me, I had to really work at
it. The comment that this "sense" is temporal independent is one I believe 100% Others agree so my experiences though rare were not isolated (thank
God). Something not affected by local time is also independent of conventional 3D spacial references, hence is not explained by, or answerable to
Relativity. But this characteristic is the hall mark of Quantum Mechanics.
Why I and others think QM is involved is due to the results I and a minority had. With great effort (they kept telling me "your working to hard at
it") I was confident I had acquired many of the targets, not sounding scientific but it just "felt" I was right on. It took a lot of checking
because what was seen was determined to be the correct target area, just not the present time. (thank God for old maps, records and photos). Three of
us had this habit of seeing sometime in the past or so it appeared, for me the photos were the clincher. I seemed to hit around 80 years before, the
other guy about 120 years past from the date of the studies.
The third guy also 80 years past but possibly an in-determined date in the future. Just what he saw was never revealed to the rest of us. An example
of not needing to know. And exasperating for the rest of us believe me, because to paraphrase President Clinton responding to a question on UFO's
"we wanted to know". As ridiculous as this sounds, if QM is involved, then the past, what we call "now" and future are equally "peek-able". The
energy value of the information would be the same. Keep in mind distance, and that conventionally means time are not a factor. Just how this
perceptual variation may occur among remote viewers is currently unknown to me, but I know its under intense study.
While co-ordinate based targeting is the most known, there are other methods. The OP approach is IMHO a good one, and I echo the comment to keep the
"clue clutter" to a minimum. We seem better at filling in the blanks when we don't have to process what may be, for a given person, distracting
texture's. Very neat post!