Originally posted by Collin
The problem with all the over-analysis on ATS is that IMO it tends to debunk everything 'paranoic' and there is so much more being covered up than many of us can currently have a clue about.
( ... )
To get at the truth of things some of us are being a little more open and less condescending to the experiencers of their truths that do come forth and struggle to break free from the matrix.![]()
( ... )
This guy (Art Bell's caller) is for real, he knew his career was over and his life was about to end and of course for all of us who HAVEN'T been there where he was at on the night he apparently decided to act out of his mixed feelings about his role in a massive cover-up and call in to the show IMHO....
....you probably don't want to go there !
![]()
As I have implied in my previous comment, I also try to avoid "over-analysis" .
In order to form an opinion in this particular case, I advise everyone to examine the caller's statement independently from the fact that the satellite transmission failed during the conversation. It frets me to see that the satellite disturbance, combined with the fact that Art Bell invited Area 51 employees to call in on September 11, 1997, seems to add credibility to the caller's claim.
Maybe "they" did decide to disturb the show, but still you cannot conclude that this particular caller was crucial, or legit.
If he was "real", he really was able to bring to proof that the "military establishment" is infiltrated by "extradimensional aliens", and that the US government plans, or at least will tolerate, mass killings ("so the few that are left would be easier to control") .
He also knew that "they" would have tracked him down shortly if he goes live on air. He wanted to safe the life of hundreds of millions of people.
Why did he call Art Bell?
[edit on 11-3-2005 by popular mechanics]



