It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by pirhanna
C'mon, we can't make Obama look better in his bad behavior by pointing out that the last President was just as bad. Actually, it makes the whole thing worse. If the last President was a pillar of virtue, then Obama could be excused a LITTLE for not being aware of where his decisions would lead. Having Bush as his predecessor leaves no excuse of ignorance or confusion. We watched at least the last 2-3 years of Bush's stupidity to know exactly what continuing those policies, like Obama did, would do.
Booo on Obama. Bad bad BAD judgement and blaming the last guy just doesn't pass the laugh test when we're almost through the first 4 year term.
Could Bush have still been blaming Clinton for whatever problems he had in 2003? lol.. Of course not.. To whatever limited extent Obama's terrible conduct COULD have been deflected by looking at others..that stuff went out the window a year or more ago for being relevant. It's his tar baby now.
(All 5+ TRILLION of it...Now that is one loaded diaper on the baby!)
edit on 19-4-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by sonnny1
There you go; you are only thinking in terms of party lines. Do you think any other president or even Romney would do good? R-money and Obama have the same backers pushing for them to be president. The only one who is not bought is Ron Paul. If you do not understand that the entire government needs restructuring then you are lost. See what happened to the Roman empire, the corrupt senators enjoyed their lives while their country burned.