It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ugie1028
Hello Guys,
I just came across this video. This video is using the newly released video of 911 (FOIA requests) to create a working theory on how the trade center towers 1 & 2 were demolished using cherry pickedaudio and video evidence of eyewitnesses and actual collapse videos.
Originally posted by Classified Info
The problem is that the vast majority of the people escaped the towers alive that day and I have yet to hear one single one of them comment about some odd looking boxes that mysteriously appeared in their office that day.
This continual grasping at straws is becoming more and more ridiculous with each passing year.
Originally posted by ugie1028
Cherry picking? Have YOU gone through all of the FOIA releases that support YOUR version of events?
Also... please do not misquote me. If you cant handle the truth of this conspiracy in general... go find another forum!
WTC North Tower fallling in its own footprint
in a controlled demolition, spewing a pyroclastic dust cloud.
Originally posted by ugie1028
Hello Guys,
I just came across this video. This video is using the newly released video of 911 (FOIA requests) to create a working theory on how the trade center towers 1 & 2 were demolished using audio and video evidence of eyewitnesses and actual collapse videos.
/discuss!
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by burntheships
Plainly the Towers didn't fall in their own footprint because the whole WTC site and adjacent off-site buildings were damaged or destroyed.
What is your assertion of cd's worth as against qualified professionals ( i.e NIST ) ?
Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by burntheships
Plainly the Towers didn't fall in their own footprint because the whole WTC site and adjacent off-site buildings were damaged or destroyed.
What is your assertion of cd's worth as against qualified professionals ( i.e NIST ) ?
Were they qualified in Controlled Demolitions ?? Or planes hitting buildings ??
Your own laughable logic owns you.
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by burntheships
Plainly the Towers didn't fall in their own footprint because the whole WTC site and adjacent off-site buildings were damaged or destroyed.
What is your assertion of cd's worth as against qualified professionals ( i.e NIST ) ?
Were they qualified in Controlled Demolitions ?? Or planes hitting buildings ??
Your own laughable logic owns you.
Well this is what a demolition expert, Mark Loizeaux, thinks about cd at the WTC :-
www.youtube.com...
There don't seem to be too many "planes hitting buildings " specialists in the phone book.
E. Objectives.
1) ATC operational errors are reportable but are not investigated by AFS. However, there may be cases when an ASI is investigating a pilot error and discovers the error was made by ATC or was the result of a coordination error between ATC centers. If this should be the case, contact one of the navigation specialists for guidance (paragraph 7-90).
2) Successful completion of this task results in the closing of an error investigation or verification of authorization for operation in the oceanic SAO and with reporting the results in the Air Traffic Quality Assurance (ATQA) database and in Program Tracking and Reporting Subsystem (PTRS). In coordination with a navigation specialist, the inspector should recommend action to prevent future errors, such as equipment replacement, remedial training or counseling. Reporting the cause of the error on the appropriate form(s) is very important. It is the cause of the error that helps determine trends, training deficiencies, etc.
3) Completion of these tasks may require a cooperative effort between certificate management offices (CMO), FSDOs, International Field Offices (IFO), certificate-holding district offices (CHDO), navigation specialists, maintenance inspectors and avionics inspectors.
4) Although oceanic error investigations are not intended to be enforcement actions, they can result in enforcement, if the Enforcement Decision Tool (EDT) indicates an Enforcement Investigative Report (EIR) is warranted. If an EIR is necessary, the inspector will initiate and complete the report according to FAA Order 2150.3.