It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by yeahright
Personally I think you should close this thread.
I'm thinking he's just trolling.
But in case he's not maybe he can show the mods the proof then you can reopen the thread for more comment.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by homervb
Exactly! The Walmart parking lot has 30x more camera coverage than the Pentagon. It's a budget thing! OR.... it's a flat out lie, and there are dozens of angles of that strike and impact, but they aren't being released. Now why would they not be released?
Originally posted by shortsticks
Let me tell you, that hole didn't collapse until the next day after when I was there. It was a small hole...
Originally posted by shortsticks
reply to post by yeahright
technically correct. inherently incorrect. I hope you and others can understand. My first-hand knowledge of the debris is: FIRST HAND. No plane parts. how is this so hard? I don't understand. Try again, if you please.
I can go to any airport in the country and stand on a spot where there's no plane. Is that first hand knowledge that no plane ever occupied that spot? Would it be first hand knowledge that no plane was there the previous day?
Originally posted by shortsticks
reply to post by grey580
omg, if you are here to tell the official story, I think you're on the wrong forum, bud!
The eyewitnesses who were there at the time of the impact have differing opinions, the only released camera footage lacks any evidence of an airliner, so this person's first-hand knowledge is just about as close as one can possibly get to "facts."
Originally posted by shortsticks
reply to post by yeahright
technically correct. inherently incorrect. I hope you and others can understand. My first-hand knowledge of the debris is: FIRST HAND. No plane parts. how is this so hard? I don't understand. Try again, if you please.
Originally posted by shortsticks
reply to post by grey580
omg, if you are here to tell the official story, I think you're on the wrong forum, bud!
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by getreadyalready
The eyewitnesses who were there at the time of the impact have differing opinions, the only released camera footage lacks any evidence of an airliner, so this person's first-hand knowledge is just about as close as one can possibly get to "facts."
Except for the witnesses who saw a plane.
Originally posted by grey580
Originally posted by shortsticks
reply to post by grey580
omg, if you are here to tell the official story, I think you're on the wrong forum, bud!
I've been here long enough to read many posts with bogus information.
Claims of UFO's that turn out to be either bugs or birds.
And outright lies.
Deny Ignorance, right?
So I show you a post that CatHerder did. And all you can do is laugh at it.
But you don't offer any proof.
Besides snarky remarks what have you brought to the table?
Where's the proof?