It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by antonia
Yes, I do expect them to. I pay taxes, I want answers. If they have the proof just release it and everyone shuts up (well, most of em shut up).
Furthermore your Citgo answer doesn't wash. They took the tapes, if you have physical possession of that media and no one else has a copy it's your property. It's the government's property now.
You say that now but if you had something worth lots of money and the government gave it away you would start yourown thread "How the gov stole my XXX".
Just because they take something doesn't mean it's theirs.
If they confiscate a gun in a self defense situation, they give it back if it's proven the shooting was justified. Even though I'm sure they would love to keep and dispose every gun they come across.
Originally posted by Imagewerx
reply to post by yorkshirelad
I watched that as well,a VERY well made program with lots of interviews with the air traffic controllers involved that day and playbacks of the ATC tapes from the same time.Nice to see a program based on reality and hard facts that can be 100% proven as being fact,not the paranoid mumbo jumbo with no basis in reality which are all too prevalant on here.
Originally posted by babybunnies
For me, the best evidence that no plane hit the Pentagon is the complete lack of footage showing the plane on approach.
With all the CCTV and building security cameras in place around the Pentagon, the hardest part that I have a problem believing is that there is no footage of the plane coming in.
Release the footage, and you'll silence the skeptics, well, most of them anyway. There will still be the idiots out there who will claim the footage has been faked.
In all countries where the Berne Convention standards apply, copyright is automatic, and need not be obtained through official registration with any government office. Once an idea has been reduced to tangible form, for example by securing it in a fixed medium (such as a drawing, sheet music, photograph, a videotape, or a computer file), the copyright holder is entitled to enforce his or her exclusive rights.
Originally posted by KnightFire
Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by shortsticks
This has been rehashed to no end.
And here on ATS there was an incredibly well researched post showing pictures of landing gear, wheel rims and parts of engine of the type used on that plane.
For me the burden of proof must pretty extensive and well researched to show that it was something other than a plane that hit the pentagon.
If you will take a look at the post above you will see the thought and research that went into showing that a 757 did indeed hit the Pentagon.
Did someone come by and seed those 2 pieces of evidence after the crash?
I find that unlikely but if you can convince me otherwise I'm willing to listen.
So... what do you have?
Oh come on, we all know these pictures where Photoshopped. The US Government has a histroy of using Photoshop, just ask Barry about his birth certificate.
Originally posted by InspirationEverywhere
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I'll look through it another day myself, just wondering, if even some of the evidence of the pentagon attack was submitted or discussed in a court of law, how could the footage of an extra 25, 50, even 80 cameras not be of incredible importance and benefit to all concerned!!