It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

SECRET SPACE WAR - Which side are TPTB on? Which ALIENS do 'Star Wars' Satellites Target?

page: 15
53
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 10:27 AM
link   
Isn't this part of the article a hoot?

Reagan, in his discussion of the sighting with Norman C. Miller added that he had told Nancy about the UFO he had seen, and they had done personal research on UFOs. This research had uncovered the facts that there were references to UFOs in Egyptian hieroglyphics. Reagan was telling his story in a very animated way. This led Miller to conclude that Reagan seriously believed in UFOs. He asked him, "Governor, are you telling me that you saw a UFO?"

Suddenly, according to Miller, Reagan realized that he was talking to a reporter. "This look crossed his face," recalled Miller, "and he said let’s just say that I’m an agnostic."

Once in the White House it didn’t take Reagan a long time to bring up the UFO subject. Jane Mayer and Doyle McManus described in their book "Landslide" that the Reagan handlers went to great lengths to "conceal" the President’s assertion that he had seen a flying saucer or his belief that there was a ghost in the Lincoln bedroom. There was also an effort to discourage Reagan from talking about two other topics he liked - Armageddon and astrology.

You have to wonder why important people are assigned to "handlers". Many people think that show dogs are the only ones who have handlers, but they're wrong. Springmeier also speaks about handlers and their purpose, but I'm sure this info is on another thread, so I'll let this one go.

Here's some more comedy:

There were a great number of these UFO, ghost, and Armageddon references written into Reagan speeches. Whether the UFO comments were planned or slips of the tongue by Reagan, the first controversial UFO comment would not be made by Reagan but by a senior member of the National Security Agency, writing on Reagan’s behalf.

On September 28, 1981, President Reagan received a letter from Major Ret. Colman VonKeviczky. VonKeviczky was the Director of the International UFO Galactic Spacecraft Research and Analytic Network (ICUFON). This group held that UFOs "represented an intergalactic task force that will destroy earth unless world leaders band together to end their hostile actions against UFOs."

VonKeviczky began his career by working for the United Nations staff audio-visual department. In 1966, he wrote to United Nations Secretary U Thant recommending a UFO authority be installed to act as a World Authority for Spatial Affairs. U Thant was interested in the UFO mystery and commissioned VonKeviczky "to work on a preliminary memo on how the UFO problem could be inserted in the U.N. agenda."




posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 10:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Unity_99

This is a Ludicrous argument, and as to the Nazi's, I can tell you they were on the moon. You don't have to believe me, but I know 100% its true.


edit on 23-4-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)


I can tell you that my dog flies to Mars but it doesn't make it so since neither my dog nor you can provide anything except supposition and presupposition for verification.



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 10:28 AM
link   
so we are at a space war with aliens

who sends troops?what do they use?

threads like these getting 200 flags is disappointing



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 10:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Druscilla

I've stated this before, as well as someone else:

To the believers - The Galactic Council has proclaimed the war over. NO WAR.
To people like myself; skeptics - There never was a space war. NO WAR.

With no war being a factor on both sides of the argument, the OP is moot.

Anything beyond that is bickering over whether anything ever actually happened at all.




Not only is there an ongoing war taking place, but civilans are being held ransome in it and being radiated out of their trees. And poisoned.

However, I don't believe ET is involved yet, in their fight.

Because ET doesnt do things like that.

If ET gets involved they would use the remote to pause the time program for planet earth and make some changes, clean things up, not sure how many might notice, they would have this odd de ju vu perhaps, but they are way over the heads of these warring factions.

From what I understand, this is already happening to some extent.

Now if it were decided, by enough people waking up and asking for help, holding peace, desiring a completely equal but free, upgraded type world, forgiving everyone and themselves, ready for an upgrade and rescue, with their free will, for they're in a school, we arent given the answers to the tests, but we are nudged strongly, and this is a possibility.

If they unmask and the curtain comes up, it won't be a war scenario. We would be downloaded with so much information, the veil itself would lift and memories flood in.

So ET wars isn't a term I actually believe in.

Note again, true Positive Higher Up ETs do not fight the bad guys, they just use their remotes, and everyone gets missing time.

This "ET War" is our bloodlines duking it out. And they are sort of ET I guess, I mean we're all cosmic. But that is not what I call advanced ETs or anything like that.


Even more so, our black ops duking it out, for they are contracted to negatives and some things that live under our earth and oceans, and in the vicintity of our planet. Mars and Saturn come to mind, and lower frequencies basically.

Because I've been told that many bloodlines are quite religious in their own gnostic duality type beliefs and only some of them, the more ET ones themselves, who are working heavily with the black ops are privy to more of the real info.
edit on 23-4-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 10:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by Unity_99

Not only is there an ongoing war taking place, but civilans are being held ransome in it and being radiated out of their trees. And poisoned.


WT...



Originally posted by Unity_99However, I don't believe ET is involved yet, in their fight. Because ET doesnt do things like that.


I'd like to talk to these ETs that you know so well, could you arrange?



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 10:49 AM
link   
On that score, ie. real ETs using their remotes to pause things and clean up the mess, its already been done numerously. This kindgergarden playpen has been pretty messy, and the inappropriate use of nuclear and other technologies impacts other systems, that they are also co-workers or managers for, or under the progressive manager position, so they would hear the call.

Universes nestle into each other, connect and even are dependent on the foundation levels, or lower frequency levels, and there is absolutely no way, that we would be allowed to harm anything.

So any given day, you could have gone through that day a number of times and not even known it.

These mismanagers of the school can only go so far.



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 10:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Getsmart
 


This is bunkum............... "which aliens do 'Star Wars' satellites target?"

None is the answer obviously............If any aliens were getting shot at, don't
you think they would shoot the weapons that were shooting at them!!!!!!!

bah!
edit on 23-4-2012 by rigel4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 10:59 AM
link   
And even further in their plans, is 2014, to turn CERN on 100%, for what purpose? There are countless ideas, relating to possiblities such as opening the stargate. But if they open anything there would have to be an allignment or particular astrological configuration overhead that would facilitate that stargate. To systems of controllers? To shadow? During an eclipse?

Some people really think they're in a war, but the real war is the opposition, shadow feels it is in a war against Light, and thats the real war, and it doesnt exist, because Light doesnt fight wars. its more of a failure on shadow side, and their shifting/transferring blame. Bullies have low self esteem.

Cern can also be a part of their erroneous plans once again, to create a dark matter or shadow, universe. Ie. do they think they can influence this one, overtake this one?

Its not even possible but they don't understand, all things are coded far over their heads, and was never a part of the do able items in this school.

So what is planned from this year until 2014?

As far as earth factions are concerned, the one group, of which D Rockefeller/Kissinger etc is a part, is holding the entire earth hostage, with their advanced weaponry. But is the other side(s), fighting for the people, or for a power/empire transfer? I think this is just mafia boss's fighting about who is going to be the godfather.
edit on 23-4-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 11:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Unity_99
On that score, ie. real ETs using their remotes to pause things and clean up the mess, its already been done numerously. This kindgergarden playpen has been pretty messy, and the inappropriate use of nuclear and other technologies impacts other systems, that they are also co-workers or managers for, or under the progressive manager position, so they would hear the call.

Universes nestle into each other, connect and even are dependent on the foundation levels, or lower frequency levels, and there is absolutely no way, that we would be allowed to harm anything.

So any given day, you could have gone through that day a number of times and not even known it.

These mismanagers of the school can only go so far.


I am so sorry but your posts are unintelligible.



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 11:50 AM
link   
One reason why the Shadow Govt doesn't want to admit there are UFO's, aliens, ET's out there besides could be because they are afraid of the mob w/ pitchforks when the general public learns of their crimes (treason, murder, kidnap, mind control experiments, genetic manipulation, illegal drugs, etc).

Another could be because the Shadow Govt has denied the existence of such entities for so long, that they are trapped now. If they admitted it now, it would come out that they've been lying to the public for many years. Who would believe them then? Not even the sheeple would trust the govt at that point. TPTB could completely lose control. Thus, the subterfuge continues...



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 12:01 PM
link   
reply to post by AlchemicalBinoculars
 


Only to someone who has their mentality chained into a box. Not to mention I don't do left hemisphere posts. So, your comprehension is deliberately dumbed down?

Its rather clear what is being said.



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 12:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Unity_99
 

Your posts are unintelligible and on that we agree.



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 12:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by AlchemicalBinoculars
reply to post by Unity_99
 

Your posts are unintelligible and on that we agree.



When you state something over and over again as factual, it is just bullying. And I am posting as an experiencer, who also. along the way, has attracted some unusual connections to those probably tagging experiencers, and I happen to care about all people equally and post in good form without harming anyone, so alot of answers have been given too, and strong nudges to look in certain areas. Not to mention what I can already put together alot of this, and have some knowledge inside me, so know what files to keep up on.

By all means, if you can't follow what I'm saying, just avoid my posts. But don't keep stalking me with the same lame words, for that just tells us your mindset.

Buddha had a saying, if you give a gift and its not accepted, does it return to the sender? I don't accept your gift, my dear. So the intent to harm returns to you.
edit on 23-4-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 12:21 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 01:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Afterthought
 



There were a great number of these UFO, ghost, and Armageddon references written into Reagan speeches. Whether the UFO comments were planned or slips of the tongue by Reagan, the first controversial UFO comment would not be made by Reagan but by a senior member of the National Security Agency, writing on Reagan’s behalf.


I cannot recall a single reference to UFO's or ghosts in any Reagan speech, and I watched all too many of them. Armageddon was indeed a favorite theme, but he didn't tend to us that exact word.


On September 28, 1981, President Reagan received a letter from Major Ret. Colman VonKeviczky. VonKeviczky was the Director of the International UFO Galactic Spacecraft Research and Analytic Network (ICUFON). This group held that UFOs "represented an intergalactic task force that will destroy earth unless world leaders band together to end their hostile actions against UFOs."



And in February, 1973 I received a postcard from Isaac Asimov. There is no reason to believe that Reagan either solicited the letter or took its contents seriously.



VonKeviczky began his career by working for the United Nations staff audio-visual department. In 1966, he wrote to United Nations Secretary U Thant recommending a UFO authority be installed to act as a World Authority for Spatial Affairs. U Thant was interested in the UFO mystery and commissioned VonKeviczky "to work on a preliminary memo on how the UFO problem could be inserted in the U.N. agenda."


A UN projector boy is not necessarily an authority on space travel. In 1966, the UN was wrestling with the issue of the peaceful exploration of outer space. Establish policies for potential extra-terrestrial contact was not only reasonable, but timely.



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 03:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Getsmart
 


Another thing which is not clear to me, is which theory is most valid regarding what are the Greys? Where they are from and what is their agenda?

All I can tell you is what I have discovered. The little Grays are bio-mechanical beings, created by, and ran by, what I believe are the Draco/Reptilians. Now all Reptilians are not bad, the ones without a tail, mostly Females, like humanity. The Draco looks at humans as a human looks at cattle, they call us "containers".
The little Grays are not the Tall Greys, the EBON-2 species. These are the ones President Eisenhower and staff met at at Holloman AFB, and made deals with in 1953.
Dwight D Eisenhower had three secret meetings with aliens from another planet



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 05:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by autowrench
[
All I can tell you is what I have discovered. The little Grays are bio-mechanical beings, created by, and ran by, what I believe are the Draco/Reptilians. Now all Reptilians are not bad, the ones without a tail, mostly Females, like humanity. The Draco looks at humans as a human looks at cattle, they call us "containers".
The little Grays are not the Tall Greys, the EBON-2 species. These are the ones President Eisenhower and staff met at at Holloman AFB, and made deals with in 1953.
Dwight D Eisenhower had three secret meetings with aliens from another planet


Would you consider any of the above as fact or is it all conjecture?



posted on Apr, 24 2012 @ 07:52 PM
link   
reply to post by AlchemicalBinoculars
 

Again...You have...either by the way I posted...or by lack of understanding that is not your fault...misunderstood my response. I do not believe or advocate or even in ANY WAY...agree with any SPACE WAR being waged by sides named that I know do not exist.

This is why I said...there are things I am aware of that you do not and are taking my statements in a manner that represents what you have just posted. I am not paranoid...I only make determinations based on observations and cause and effect experimentation or detection. It was in the Detection field and in this case...my internal alarm was ringing about an issue you would have no information about. This is not due to any lack of ability on your part...just the fact that I have a certain amount of information that has to do with what I was trying to explain.

There are certain realities that are not at all represented by this topic in any way and I will tell you...I distance myself from any concepts or conjecture of what you THINK that I was advocating or representing...because I do neither.

This is a simple misunderstanding between you and I and unfortunately...I cannot go any deeper into certain aspects other than to say...I KNOW not believe very similar to your opinion expressed that you unfortunately lumped me into. Split Infinity



posted on Apr, 24 2012 @ 10:48 PM
link   
reply to post by SplitInfinity
 


Why not quit the incoherent babbling and spill the beans on this information only you are privy?



posted on Apr, 24 2012 @ 11:48 PM
link   
reply to post by AlchemicalBinoculars
 

I don't appreciate that statement. I have tried to explain in the best way I could without causing an issue and in return...I get what you posted. It is unfortunate because I would have enjoyed to debate with you but rudeness is something I dislike...even when I do it.

Split Infinity



new topics

top topics



 
53
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join