Why are there no other country's military bases in the US??, page 9


Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 20-4-2012 @ 02:19 AM by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by edaced4



Because America does not require foreign powers to protect them. Other countries look to America when SHTF, and our bases provide worldwide stability. Not a difficult question to answer, seems to me OP just wants to start something.


reply posted on 21-4-2012 @ 12:26 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by something wicked



I have no idea what you are talking about.

The world is simple. When two tigers encircle you, and one says it won't bother you if you don't go against it, and the other won't bother you if you do what it says, people tend to go with the former than the later. It's an issue of if you have to choose a side, chose the one that is more freer. And while no oe is perfect, at this moment in time, nations are freer if they choose America over Russia or China.

That's the game of geopolitics. And to be frank, where one falls, another will always take it's place. it's not an issue of mind your own business. It's a natural law that one side will always become greater than the other. Super powers don't fall and then there is freedom. Super powers simply are. It's a matter of how the superpower treats the other nations. Before America, Russia, and China, it was England, France, and Spain. Before them, it was someone else. And after America, China, and Russia, it will be someone else. Who knows. Maybe India, Brazil, and Iran.

The cycle cannot be broken...to quote Mass Effect.


reply posted on 25-4-2012 @ 04:36 AM by RebelwoaCloo
1) There are many foreign outfits in the USA, just not as visible as our bases overseas. We put our bases in the spotlight, but how would, say, admitting that NATO troops training here be received by John Q. Public?
2) Yes, New Mexico still has German soldiers here, on the ground and in flight school. There's been unreported, under-reported, and unfriendly encounters with U.S. citizens that have stumbled across restricted areas. I have no verifiable knowledge of other foreign participation in my locale.
3) "Internment" camps are here; nothing but huge, empty barbed-wire enclosures in the High Desert. I use the quotation marks because I'm not 100% positive of its intended nature, but I doubt it's for a new Jurassic Park.
4) The railroads that lead to the above.
5) Threads endure sometimes because not everyone takes the time to read all of the posts, and not everyone is going to believe your or my input. See: "Chiming in."

And I will prove my "Chiming in" theory because I'd rather just ask questions now than do the research. (Because this is my first time here and I don't know any of you from grays or Aykroyds)
1) Any commentary on the decals placed on the reverse side of traffic signs?
2) Any threads concerning the readiness of the National Guard and local police departments to impose Marshall Law?
3) Any talk about the fact that since 1985 every single car sold in the USA can be instantly demobilized by the Fed? (Check it out in the Popular Mechanics archives)
4) Recently passed legislation giving President Obama and his successors the authority to shut down the entire Internet for "National Security?" (2011)
5) ECHELON? "Ancient" eavesdropping on anyone.

OK, my first post here so let's see if I survive the MIB, the ATS backlash, and all that skita. I'm just wondering if I'm paranoid or justified.

Thank you for your response. Facts are facts and there's no such thing as a wrong opinion.


reply posted on 22-5-2012 @ 02:02 AM by pugachev
Originally posted by daaskapital
Originally posted by MattNC
Originally posted by daaskapital
Originally posted by alldaylong
Originally posted by Adyta
Because nobody has defeated us and we have not begged for anyones protection.
edit on 4/18/2012 by Adyta because: (no reason given)


Had you forgotten about The Viet Cong?




We must also remember the farmers in Iraq who beat the USA, and the soon to be defeat by the hands of the goat herders in Afghanistan.

Star for you!


Last I checked, the objective was to oust a dictator in Iraq and take that countries ability to threaten other countries in the region.

Objective achieved, we're pulling out as per the plan.


The country is worse of today, and is now a breeding ground for terrorists. Moreso, than what it was under Saddam's control. So no, objective not achieved. The USA pulled out because they were losing, and have now lost. Both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars were/are wars that cannot be won. Just how the USA lost the Vietnam war. It is virtually the same, just set in the Middle East.

You're trying to spin the meaning of "defeat" so you can take a shot at the US Military. You're just a bitter Ausie and you're in the very much minority. I work with Ausies almost daily. A hardy bunch with great attitudes toward life. They get it's not all roses but soilder on.


The USA was defeated in Iraq. Terrorists are raising hell there, much worse than what it was when Saddam was in power. So, if one were to address the Iraq war under "official" circumstance, as you did. The war was very much a failure.

There isn't a military power in the world that could go toe-to-toe with the US Military. Russia and China would provide the most trouble. But here's the key thing: There's no reason for them to do so.


Keep on wanking mate. The USA hasn't won a proper war since the assistance they gave in WW2.

Korea - Stalemate
Vietnam - Defeat (At the hands of farmers)
1st Gulf War - essentially a loss, considering Saddam regained power
2nd Gulf War/Iraq War - Loss, due to increased instability
Afghanistan - Will be a loss once left to the control of the Afghan National Army.
edit on 18-4-2012 by daaskapital because: sp


Vietnam wasn't a military defeat. Rules of engagement and political policy made that war impossible. The US defeated the Vietcong and NVA at every engagement.

1st. Gulf War was a complete success and we did everything we set out to do.

2nd Gulf War, also a complete success. Iraqi military destroyed and Baghdad taken in less than a month.
Again, US military dominated every engagement before and after the fall of Baghdad. Everything after that is politics and can not be won militarily, no matter how powerful the army. If slaughtering every man, woman, and child was an option, would have been finished in 2003.

Afghanistan, See Iraq.


reply posted on 23-5-2012 @ 09:54 PM by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by MESSAGEFROMTHESTARS



Yes, the leader of the free world invades other countries against their will, kills innocent civilians, and sets up crooked governments and banks against the peoples will. Yes, we are such a great nation. Not...America is one of the biggest bully nation the world has ever really seen for quite some time.
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Next week all military bases go on 3-week alert
  Posted 2 days ago with 10 member flags
The US Military Can Clearly Afford A Major Budget Cut
  Posted 19 days ago with 5 member flags
DARPA Cheetah runs faster than Usain
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags
Air Force Seeking Cyber-Weapons
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags
Space Enabled Effects for Military Engagements (Seeme)
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags