How Accurate is this? (Bilderberg Group), page 2

Originally posted by OldCorp
One striking feature is that the office of the POTUS is decidedly out of the loop. Or is it?

On today's episode of 'Pimp-My-Thread' MESSAGEOFTHESTARS posts, shamelessly, a recent thread that he created.

Washington Post Suggests Bilderberg Group To Pick Romney’s Running Mate
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by TheGrandWarlock

---

That's probably the scariest thing I have ever seen.

Originally posted by alienreality
reply to post by boncho

---

One thing bad about these meetings for any of our elected officials attending them, is that they are committing a serious violation, perhaps even a form of treason.. I have heard many people talk about it before, that any elected official attending any secret meeting outside the country with no press or public discussion, is a serious crime..

Of course we know that these people attending could care less about constitutional laws because they are so very very important and above the rest of society, (in their own minds)...They just thumb their noses at the rest of us..

In my opinion the people attending these meetings should be hung by the neck from a tall oak tree.

Yes, it's in violation of the Logan Act.

2nd

reply to post by TheGrandWarlock

---

Pretty much meaningless.....You can connect anything to anything else with enough steps.

For instance....Kevin Bacon www.forevergeek.com...

Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by TheGrandWarlock

---

Pretty much meaningless.....You can connect anything to anything else with enough steps.

For instance....Kevin Bacon www.forevergeek.com...

Are these connections done in steps to create the illusion of being connected, or are they actually direct connections that those individuals listed have?

If they are genuine connections then it is most definitely not meaningless.

Originally posted by The_Phantom

Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by TheGrandWarlock

---

Pretty much meaningless.....You can connect anything to anything else with enough steps.

For instance....Kevin Bacon www.forevergeek.com...

Are these connections done in steps to create the illusion of being connected, or are they actually direct connections that those individuals listed have?

If they are genuine connections then it is most definitely not meaningless.

edit on 19-4-2012 by The_Phantom because: (no reason given)

You're missing the point....Finding a Direct connection between two people or two industries is one thing....but then you when you spread that out to a direct connections between the second individual or industry...then take it out a third time...and a forth time...It becomes meaningless.

If you try hard enough, you can link anything to anything else, through degrees. Only first level degrees should matter. For instance if my father were President...then I would have a viable link to him....However if my Father was a cousin, to a guy married to an businesswoman, who once did business with a foreign dignitary, who's brother was a barber who once cut the President's hair when he was a child....then there is no real link.

reply to post by TheGrandWarlock

---

wow! someone put a little work into that foodweb. I think they forgot to add the ant, birds and trees to that ecology. the only ones who arent in it are all us lil monkeys

Originally posted by bhornbuckle75

Originally posted by The_Phantom

Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by TheGrandWarlock

---

Pretty much meaningless.....You can connect anything to anything else with enough steps.

For instance....Kevin Bacon www.forevergeek.com...

Are these connections done in steps to create the illusion of being connected, or are they actually direct connections that those individuals listed have?

If they are genuine connections then it is most definitely not meaningless.

edit on 19-4-2012 by The_Phantom because: (no reason given)

You're missing the point....Finding a Direct connection between two people or two industries is one thing....but then you when you spread that out to a direct connections between the second individual or industry...then take it out a third time...and a forth time...It becomes meaningless.

If you try hard enough, you can link anything to anything else, through degrees. Only first level degrees should matter. For instance if my father were President...then I would have a viable link to him....However if my Father was a cousin, to a guy married to an businesswoman, who once did business with a foreign dignitary, who's brother was a barber who once cut the President's hair when he was a child....then there is no real link.

I didn't miss your point, I agree that you can connect anything through degrees. Are the connections made in the chart by degrees or direct to the individuals on the list?

reply to post by The_Phantom

---

I see what you're asking now....But honestly after looking at the list again, I can't make heads or tails of it, and I think that's intentional by whoever made it. Notice how there's an inner circle of names surrounding the Bilderberg Group? Well logic would dictate that these individuals are themselves members, and that they have connections to the various companies shown in the rest of the image....If that were the case, however the graph would be much simpler, and would get less chaotic as you reach the center.These individuals would simply have a single line running towards the Bilderberg Group....That isn't what the chart shows. It shows the same chaotic, impossible to decypher mish mash of lines both inside the inner circle as outside. This makes no logical sense.

When using www.theyrule.net... you can see the board of directors on different companies. With those board of directors you will see different size people that show up as the board of directors. The skinny ones might not sit on any other boards or maybe only one. The fat they get the more boards they sit on. I guess call them the fat cats.

Simple example of the board of directors of Apple. Notice the skinny ones have no other links. But the fat cat sits on apple, avon and general elecctric.




Heres a more complicated example. Showing where theres more fat cats and a lot of connected companies to a single board member.




You can play around with it to find out who all the true fat cats are and create a complex map by deleting the board members who are only on one board. The fat cats who sits on the most boards would pretty much win in most cases due to influence in so many areas.




But you can get carried away and make it to confusing if you start looking at the huge web between all these board of directors who run corporate america.




You can also right click of these fat cats and it will usually show a wiki link for information on who the person is.

But your best bet is to just play with it and learn what your doing by jumping in with both feet.
www.theyrule.net...

Here is a couple other web sites you can also play with.
littlesis.org...
www.jigsaw.com...
How to do corporate research.
www.corp-research.org...

Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags

The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags

Organic food hit piece to coincide with California proposition 37.
  Posted 2 days ago with 67 member flags

The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags

The catch all mental health disorder... Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)
  Posted 15 days ago with 42 member flags

A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags

Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags

666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: