Revealed – the corporate network that runs the world

First a list of the companies involved.

The top 50 of the 147 superconnected companies

1. Barclays plc
2. Capital Group Companies Inc
3. FMR Corporation
4. AXA
5. State Street Corporation
6. JP Morgan Chase & Co
7. Legal & General Group plc
8. Vanguard Group Inc
9. UBS AG
10. Merrill Lynch & Co Inc
11. Wellington Management Co LLP
12. Deutsche Bank AG
13. Franklin Resources Inc
14. Credit Suisse Group
15. Walton Enterprises LLC
16. Bank of New York Mellon Corp
17. Natixis 18. Goldman Sachs Group Inc
19. T Rowe Price Group Inc
20. Legg Mason Inc
21. Morgan Stanley
22. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc
23. Northern Trust Corporation
24. Société Générale
25. Bank of America Corporation
26. Lloyds TSB Group plc
27. Invesco plc
28. Allianz SE
29. TIAA
30. Old Mutual Public Limited Company
31. Aviva plc
32. Schroders plc
33. Dodge & Cox
34. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc*
35. Sun Life Financial Inc
36. Standard Life plc
37. CNCE
38. Nomura Holdings Inc
39. The Depository Trust Company
40. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
41. ING Groep NV
42. Brandes Investment Partners LP
43. Unicredito Italiano SPA
44. Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan
45. Vereniging Aegon
46. BNP Paribas
47. Affiliated Managers Group Inc
48. Resona Holdings Inc
49. Capital Group International Inc
50. China Petrochemical Group Compan

some interesting names that pop up.

As protests against financial power sweep the world this week, science may have confirmed the protesters’ worst fears. An analysis (pdf) of the relationships between 43,000 transnational corporations has identified a relatively small group of companies, mainly banks, with disproportionate power over the global economy.

the PDF analysis that is talked about

the PDF is rightfully called 'the network of global corporate control' (worth your time and the read!)

The study’s assumptions have attracted some criticism, but complex systems analysts contacted by New Scientist say it is a unique effort to untangle control in the global economy. Pushing the analysis further, they say, could help to identify ways of making global capitalism more stable.

The idea that a few bankers control a large chunk of the global economy might not seem like news to New York’s Occupy Wall Street movement and protesters elsewhere. But the study, by a trio of complex systems theorists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, is the first to go beyond ideology to empirically identify such a network of power. It combines the mathematics long used to model natural systems with comprehensive corporate data to map ownership among the world’s transnational corporations (TNCs).

something we at ATS have long suspected but it's always nice to get some confirmation on issues like these.

want to close this post with a cool quote that is also found in the article.

"Reality is so complex, we must move away from dogma, whether it’s conspiracy theories or free-market," says James Glattfelder. "Our analysis is reality-based."

my source

original source

once again with the "kapow!" posts. Nice.

You are conspira-licious.

Goldman Sachs is kind of hidden in the list. It's 18.

Great post.

I though I had heard Merrill Lynch got bought out a few years ago though.

For the fun of it, lets have a closer look at who owns those companies.

You might find that most are actually owned by the major investment holding tanks.

Many in fact have a large stake in each other.

To see this miracle, you need to find a list of major stock holders for each.

Yahoo Finance has a good way to research.

Example

We will use State Street Corporation (exchange symbol STT) as a guinea pig.

here is their list of major holders: STT major holders

Note: notice on the left column, we see "Ownership" and "Major Holders".

you will see "Major Direct Holders" and some "Top Institutional Holders" as well as some "Top Mutual Fund Holders"

The ones with the most shares are the real "owners", and thus have the most control of business policies.

Note the ironic part about STT. They are actually their own 4th largest stock holder in themselves


Enter the stock symbols for some others and you will see many of the same major institutional holders !!

These large investment firms are where TPTB keep much their money.
(that's why the big corporations control as much as they do !!)

The larger major holders of the corporations have representatives that give orders to the boards of directors of companies. The CEO's and Directors are small potato owners as you can see from the ownership charts !!

Now, before we ask who are the big holding tank people are, we can't find out because the tanks do not have to disclose names (by law). This is how TPTB control international commerce.

No Kidding.

Somebody should do a cross reference and see who really owns who !!


Here's the info for Morgan Stanley (symbol MS) MS holders

Guess who is one of the largest stock holders ? ----- State Street !!!!!, right along with the others.


Have fun checking all of them out.

you can do a google for the company names and go to wiki, they usually have the symbols.

or just try typing in the name in the Yahoo symbol search.

Nice diagrams and stuff. However, looks like it has propaganda right off the bat. Starts off with "A common intuition among scholars and in the media"... Academics and media are a huge part of the problem! Almost the heart. I get so frustrated how the scientist manufacture a concensus to suit the need of whoever is funding the project.

Many of the big de-populationist companies are not on there either. Where is Bayer, Merck, Monsanto Rand, etc...? How about the media? NEWS CORP? The media is the worst actor in my opinion. The absolute worst...

Still trying to figure out the whole puzzle.

reply to post by jim3981



Merck is a small player actually.

Here's who owns them Merck owners
(State Street is up there !)


Monsanto
(State Street is up there too !)


here's who owns NewsCorp NewsCorp
(The Murdochs' are small potatoes !!!) believe it or not !


and CBS CBS owners
(State Street is up there again !!)


Now guess who gives orders to those Boards of Directors ?

reply to post by xuenchen


George? Merck started Fort Detrick along with Henry Kissinger. Home of certain types of cancer causing viruses, Aids, and who knows what else...

Can't find my link on Fort Detrick at the moment.

INterested in hearing what you have to say about how this whole conspiracy works....Still new to this gig.

Not sure I can see how a bunch of mutual funds can run a company wtihout being on the board though. You suggesting the major shareholder companies give direction? Not getting your point.

Originally posted by jim3981
reply to post by xuenchen

 

George? Merck started Fort Detrick along with Henry Kissinger. Home of certain types of cancer causing viruses, Aids, and who knows what else...

Can't find my link on Fort Detrick at the moment.

INterested in hearing what you have to say about how this whole conspiracy works....Still new to this gig.

Not sure I can see how a bunch of mutual funds can run a company wtihout being on the board though. You suggesting the major shareholder companies give direction? Not getting your point.

edit on 17-4-2012 by jim3981 because: (no reason given)

The "Board" members are "advised" by the major holders who have full staffs of people who monitor all business dealings.

That's why we see so many big companies following the same policies.

Why do you think many personnel policies are similar.

Companies like State Street have 1000's of employees who make up the advisory and steering committees.
They have the best MBA and PhD talent money can buy.
They operate behind the scenes. The companies pay "fees" for the "advice".
That's one way the big guys suck money from the companies they own.
(plus that, they own all the assets and property)
AND, have all the power.

Don't be fooled into thinking all that money invested is just there for small income purposes.

The small timers like IRA's 401k's etc are the ones at risk.

Originally posted by BIHOTZ
once again with the "kapow!" posts. Nice.

You are conspira-licious.

haha

thanks!

This country wasnt founded for the banking theives.The forefathers sure as hell would have taken care of them.

Originally posted by AgentX09
This country wasnt founded for the banking theives.The forefathers sure as hell would have taken care of them.

so why aren't we?

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson

Originally posted by AgentX09
This country wasnt founded for the banking theives.The forefathers sure as hell would have taken care of them.

Don't be so sure.

It's possible that this country was founded By the banking thieves !!

The original name was "the UKnighted States of America" !!

Look back at the original corporations (British) that were part of the colonies.

And take a real close look at the Treaty of Paris (the 1783 one).
See who really won the war.

There's lots about this in older threads.

.....................Working to find some info.

Also might be interesting to find out how many of those corporations have representatives at the Bilderberg meetings. I can see several right off the bat that have names listed in the most recent meeting.

Who really won the Napoleonic war.
Rothschild got extremely rich, by taking advantage of the information he/they knew. The war was won, but the rumor or lost was spread. Stocks crashed. Bought up at pennies on the dollar. The real news came. Stocks skyrocketing. Made a fortune and it's only been going up from there =P

Just thought i'de point that out. That is when it all started for us, when the banking/corporate cabal started to take over. Rothschild dealt with the 'royals' money, (check out a book called Five men of frankfort, you can find it on Americandeception.com under 'secret societies', its very informative). Lots of books on it. They're not the only culprits of course. We have Barclay, JP Morgan, Chase, and 6 or 7 other big names that control 80% of the money on this planet.

duplicate post

Any linky goodness to illustrate your point please?

Not trying to pull your leg, and I am totally interested in figuring out how this works. The only criminals I have caught redhanded are the credit derivative banksters (Frontline the warning), 911 filmer/dancers and insurance profiteers, CIA Drug smugglers, etc....

Would like to find some good evidence with real names caught. Hard to dig up I know, but required.

Originally posted by xuenchen

Originally posted by jim3981
reply to post by xuenchen

 

George? Merck started Fort Detrick along with Henry Kissinger. Home of certain types of cancer causing viruses, Aids, and who knows what else...

Can't find my link on Fort Detrick at the moment.

INterested in hearing what you have to say about how this whole conspiracy works....Still new to this gig.

Not sure I can see how a bunch of mutual funds can run a company wtihout being on the board though. You suggesting the major shareholder companies give direction? Not getting your point.

edit on 17-4-2012 by jim3981 because: (no reason given)

The "Board" members are "advised" by the major holders who have full staffs of people who monitor all business dealings.

That's why we see so many big companies following the same policies.

Why do you think many personnel policies are similar.

Companies like State Street have 1000's of employees who make up the advisory and steering committees.
They have the best MBA and PhD talent money can buy.
They operate behind the scenes. The companies pay "fees" for the "advice".
That's one way the big guys suck money from the companies they own.
(plus that, they own all the assets and property)
AND, have all the power.

Don't be fooled into thinking all that money invested is just there for small income purposes.

The small timers like IRA's 401k's etc are the ones at risk.

reply to post by jim3981


Like I said, TPTB investors do not have their names on anything.

You need to look at the amount of wealth that is invested with the institutions that hold the stock.

Those institutions are investment managers.

The people who place money under their control are TPTB.

SSt asset management

Services for Official Institutions

Serving central banks and public sector institutions

Established in late 2000, SSgA's Official Institutions Group (OIG) oversees investment management services provided to sovereign clients such as central banks, government agencies and supranational institutions. Sovereign clients have similar objectives and challenges whether they are based in the developed or emerging world, and regardless of their geographical location. OIG recognises this and focuses on the common needs of this growing class of investors. OIG is headed by John Nugée who before he joined SSgA spent over 20 years in public sector asset management for central banks and official institutions. The group uses its experiences with clients worldwide to provide both technical and strategic advice and skills transfer to official sector clients, as well as providing them with a single point of contact for all SSgA services.

The Official Institutions Group provides a specialised service tailored to the specific needs of its clients:

Dedicated focus on central bank reserves and official sector funds

Expertise in advising on strategic policy issues for those managing public sector assets

Technical advice and skills transfer capabilities in all aspects of investment management and risk control techniques

Over $325 billion managed for 71 central banks and government clients worldwide*

If you would like to learn more about SSgA's Official Institutions Group, please contact us.

They don't take small investor clients.

Neither do the others.

Just look at who owns all the largest corporations.

Rothschild investments do the same thing.
Many people think the whole "Rothschild" thing is a myth or exaggerated.....
Think again !
Rothschild Group

I know someone who is a committee manager for one of these big institutions.
This is where I get the info.
It is common knowledge within the "business".
He is in charge of committees that actually dictate policies to corporations.

Many committees are made from as many as 10 institutions that have high percentages of stock in the same corporations. They can have as many as 4 or 5 people from each institution on a large committee.

....more info soon.

But we can't get access to individuals who are involved,
members of the Rothschild family for example will have several small corporations that own some other corporations that place the money under control of institutions.

It's an international business.

Hi xuenchen,

Thanks for digging that last stuff up. I still don't get it, but don't take it personally. I'm very new to this business.

I guess I better start a new thread focused on catching the players red handed. I have identified a few so far. Mostly from the 911 attacks, the federal reserve, the financial collapse linked to derivatives, and CIA drug running.

Keep an eye out for it. I'll put it up soon.

I need a names, faces, crimes, etc. Evidence.

I can't grasp this big old pyramid with all these distant people involved yet. Need specifics for me to grasp it more I guess.

Unless somebody can point me to a good road map or something.

Thanks,
jim

reply to post by kn0wh0w


Starred & flagged.

Good luck have been trying for the past several years to alert ATS members to this............to no avail.

Hopefully, enough of us "common folk" will put aside our differences, unite and rebel against TPTB., The real power, not Obama who is the PR Puppet.