2 ENTRIES FOUND: complacent (adjective)
self- (combining form)
www.merriam-webster.com...
com·pla·cent
adj \kəm-ˈplā-sənt\
Definition of COMPLACENT
1: marked by self-satisfaction especially when accompanied by unawareness of actual dangers or deficiencies : marked by complacency : self-satisfied
2: complaisant 1
3: unconcerned
Examples of COMPLACENT
The strong economy has made people complacent.
We have grown too complacent over the years.
---------------------------------
I feel these last two examples in the definition are the majority of the people. And the threats or dangers are real, folks. We are so polluted
with all kinds of radiation, EMF, RF, microwaves, etc. and no one wants to pay attention. It seems people are really thrilled with all the high
tech gadgetry but the dangers that come along with them go unacknowledged by many.
Want to point out that several studies in the past have been ignored. Seems to me, there is no concern but for the big bucks these days, things are
being swept under the rug, or are explained away as reliable and safe. Well, research shows these fields do affect us even down to the molecular
level...
So, I wanted to post this thread to alert you to these dangers. If we all know and show enough concern , then we could possibly change and make for
us a better safer world. Can't help but to think of the Beebe AK birds..
Please read all of the following links:
1. Introduction
Around the world, for a number of years, there has been an active debate involving the general public,scientists,journalists, politicians, and people
from the electric power andtelecom companies, all trying to answer the basic question:Is biology compatible with the ever-increasing levels of
electromagnetic fields (EMFs)? Or, to put it in more layman’s terms: Can we, as human beings, survive all the radiation?Are we built for a 24-h,
whole-body irradiation life? Are we immune to these signals, or are we actually playing with ourplanet’s future, putting life at stake? The answers
appear tobe: No, we are not designed for such EMF exposure loads.We are not immune. We are gambling with our future
Disturbance of the Immune System by Electromagnetic Felds
Please read in full:
www.scribd.com...
BEES, BIRDS AND MANKIND
Destroying nature by “electrosmog”
Ulrich Warnke
Preamble by the publishers 1
Author’s introduction 3
1. The organisation of life underlying its vulnerability 5
2. About the disappearing bees andbirds 9
3. Mechanisms of disorientation anddamage 11
4.Humans suffer functionalitydisorders 30
5. Summary 37
Scientific literature 38
Glossary (GL) 42
The question of causal effects and biological relevance of electrical and magnetic parameters is generally posed without simultaneous reference to
their relevance to life’s organisation. These questions can-not, however, be considered in isolation of each other. What role have the electrical
and magnetic fields played in the evolution of life on earth? What role are they playing in the individual development and physiological capacities of
an organism? Whoever investigates these questions must sooner or later conclude: Not only did the electrical and magnetic fields of our planet exist
before all life, but they have had a decisive hand in the evolution of the species – in water, on land and in the near-earth atmosphere. Living
creatures adapted to it in the development of their kind.Biological experience teaches us that life will use the energy pool in which it finds itself
to its best advantage.Advantageous not only because the absorbed energy is a carrier of information, useful for orientation in the environment (see
glossary;hereinafter GL). But advantageous also because the organism developed to make use of gravitational and electromagnetic interactions, creating
decisive functionalities of life. The biological system expresses itself just as the environment does and unity and coordination with its environment
is its guiding principle
Please read Full article here:
www.scribd.com...
Electro-Sensitivity: the Research
Electromagn Biol Med. 2008;27(2):135-46. Dirty electricity elevates blood sugar among electrically sensitive diabetics and may explain brittle
diabetes. Havas M. Environmental & Resource Studies, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. [email protected]
Transient electromagnetic fields (dirty electricity), in the kilohertz range on electrical wiring, may be contributing to elevated blood sugar levels
among diabetics and prediabetics. By closely following plasma glucose levels in four Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics, we find that they responded
directly to the amount of dirty electricity in their environment. In an electromagnetically clean environment, Type 1 diabetics require less insulin
and Type 2 diabetics have lower levels of plasma glucose. Dirty electricity, generated by electronic equipment and wireless devices, is ubiquitous
in the environment. Exercise
on a treadmill, which produces dirty electricity, increases plasma glucose. These findings may explain why brittle diabetics have difficulty
regulating blood sugar. Based on estimates of people who suffer from symptoms of electrical hypersensitivity (3-35%), as many as 5-60 million
diabetics worldwide may be affected. Exposure to electromagnetic pollution in its various forms may account for higher plasma glucose levels and may
contribute to the misdiagnosis of diabetes. Reducing exposure to electromagnetic
pollution by avoidance or with specially designed GS filters may enable some diabetics to better regulate their blood sugar with less medication and
borderline or pre-diabetics to remain non diabetic longer.
more research here:
www.smartmeterdangers.org...
Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation and the International Agency for
Research on Cancer (IARC) - The problem of conflict of interest & commercial influence in WHO
agencies and the need for public interest representation
PDF :
www.powerwatch.org.uk...
EMF and RF World Concerns Summary
Research articles:
emfsafetynetwork.org...
... the causal link between exposure to magnetic fields and leukemia is no longer in doubt. When we increase the dose, it increases the rate of
leukemia. Dozens of laboratory toxicological studies have demonstrated this most clearly, in vitro as well as in animals.
...Ontario researcher Magda Havas of Trent University said EHS studies with negative results have major biases. The researchers assumed that reactions
to EMFs are immediate, while there is often a delay between exposure and response. People are not switches that can be turned on and off. These
studies incorrectly insinuate that if you can not feel anything, it can't harm you. We know very well that we can't detect the taste of arsenic,
lead, DDT nor asbestos, but they are all toxic.