It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

You will not beleive this!Alert!

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 26 2004 @ 04:33 PM
link   
I just came across this!

"There are a couple of additional interesting points to note about Toutatis. In 1979, the famous alien contactee Billy Meier published a book that predicted that an asteroid would threaten Earth in this timeframe. Amazingly, Meier predicted that the asteroid would be named 'Toutatis' when it was discovered. Toutatis was subsequently discovered and named exactly as Meier predicted in 1989, a full 10 years after this prediction was published! I note that Meier never said Toutatis would necessarily collide with Earth at this time, but that it would 'threaten' Earth."

Now whats the chances of Billy being on ATS as a guest speaker and him predicting this asteroid before it was discovered (he published it in his book before the asteroid was discovered) also its the 26th september and all the commotion of this asteroid is for the 29th.

This is unreal!

Also please dont lock this thread mods i know we shouldnt open threads if the guest speaker is on but this is so strange could someone ask Billy about this?



posted on Sep, 26 2004 @ 04:51 PM
link   
There's also the NASA experiment where they experiments with this comet hitting a "fake" earth..


"Hence a possibility of the Toutatis-Earth collision is not excluded but it is completely unpredictable. To investigate conditions of a hypothetical collision of a minor planet with the Earth we made the following numerical simulation. Based on the Toutatis' orbit, we deduced such orbital elements for a fictitious minor planet "Fatum" that a shape of the orbit was very similar to that of Toutatis, but we knew in advance that "Fatum" would certainly collide with the Earth in September 2004 and we calculated values of the impact parameters.

"We created a set of 638 artificial observations of "Fatum" in 1988-1997 for the same dates and with the same random observational errors like those of Toutatis. Then we corrected the "Fatum's" orbit for different observational intervals to examine the exactness of the impact prediction in 2004. We found that in 1993 we would be sure that the collision is inevitable, and in 1997 we could determine an impact area on the Earth�s surface in range of a square of 100*100 km. We show that if we knew the impact date so early we could undertake an action to avoid the collision by trying to change the "Fatum's" heliocentric velocity only by one cm/sec."

Source


And regarding the Meier prediction..

Someone posted on Rense.com:


The 'Meier' book was apparently called, "Existing Life in the Universe". Meier does not sell it on his site.

There is a search engine, for example, at the huge Vancouver Public Library (online) that will search for any book in print or out of print...globally.

'Existing Life In The �niverse' does not come up in the search, which means that if Meier did publish it, he didn't get an ISBN for it (which means he self-published it).

Which also means you have to just take his word for it that he published it when he says he did and that he said what he did in it.

To CLAIM a book was published is one thing. To offer ROCK SOLID documentation is quite another. The Meier claim is tenuous 'evidence' at best.


And for sake of Argument, Michael Horn replied with:


Now, unless you have something substantial to enter as proof against Meier, I suggest you do a little research (tons of documents available for FREE at www.theyfly.com) and you'll see that not only was Meier ahead of the game re Toutatis but that there are literally dozens of such prophetically accurate items in copyrighted, published documents and books that constitute proof to a legal standard, years, even decades before the information was "officially" confirmed.

Source



posted on Sep, 26 2004 @ 05:25 PM
link   
hmmm how about whoever named the astriod had read his book and thought it a good name. Thus fulfilling the prophecy.



posted on Sep, 26 2004 @ 06:08 PM
link   


A minor rumor has hatched on the Internet that a large and deadly asteroid will strike Earth this fall. Bulletin board discussions cite a 63 percent chance of impact, while concerned readers have e-mailed SPACE.com wondering if it is true.

Astronomers know of no such impending doom.

The rumors are likely rooted in a real event, however. On Sept. 29, 2004 an asteroid the size of a small city will make the closest known pass of such a very large space rock anytime this century.


Nothing is going to happen. People are too quick to "predict" doom with everything.

www.space.com...

[edit on 9-26-2004 by EmbryonicEssence]



posted on Sep, 26 2004 @ 06:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by markjaxson
Also please dont lock this thread mods i know we shouldnt open threads if the guest speaker is on but this is so strange could someone ask Billy about this?


U2U SkepticOverlord or William One Sac to participate in the guest speaker event if you wish to discuss this with Mr. Horn.

Thread closed.



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join