The new cold war: Militaries vie for control of Arctic, page 1

The new cold war: Militaries vie for control of Arctic, page

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times

Topic started on 16-4-2012 @ 09:25 AM by Vasa Croe

To the world's military leaders, the debate over climate change is long over. They are preparing for a new kind of Cold War in the Arctic, anticipating that rising temperatures there will open up a treasure trove of resources, long-dreamed-of sea lanes and a slew of potential conflicts.

Well this story is disturbing to say the least. There is a lot admitted to in the following story about military operations in the Arctic region and what they want to accomplish and prepare for.

www.foxnews.com...

I think the most disturbing excerpt from this story is :

The most immediate challenge may not be war -- both military and commercial assets are sparse enough to give all countries elbow room for a while -- but whether militaries can respond to a disaster.

Wonder why they are stating that the military needs to prepare more for a disaster than war.

"We have an entire ocean region that had previously been closed to the world now opening up," Huebert said. "There are numerous factors now coming together that are mutually reinforcing themselves, causing a buildup of military capabilities in the region. This is only going to increase as time goes on."

Would love to see the roadmap for the buildup they are talking about in the region. This story wreaks of warnings and innuendo about what the government and military either know or believe is going to happen very soon.

edit on 4/16/12 by Vasa Croe because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 16-4-2012 @ 09:44 AM by Vasa Croe

And even NATO wants a piece....

www.dailymail.co.uk...

Global warming could trigger a stand-off between world powers over territory and resources in the Arctic as the ice thaws, Nato's chief warned yesterday.

Nato Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said Nato would need a military presence in the region to defuse tensions.

'I would be the last one to expect military conflict – but there will be a [Nato] military presence,' he said, ahead of talks with Russia on the subject next week. 'It should be a military presence that is not overdone, and there is a need for political and economic cooperation.'

Sounds like the military presence is already being "overdone" if all the countries laying claim are building their troops and military forces in preparation for these stated new shipping lanes and natural resource reserves opening up.

It will be interesting to see just how quickly we can deplete the natural resources of an untouched area and just how bad the fight for these resources can get.

reply posted on 16-4-2012 @ 09:47 AM by swan001

Makes me think about this G.I.JOES movie in 2008.

reply posted on 16-4-2012 @ 10:02 AM by Sinny

I'm all for Russia getting it. Don't know why but I'm loving off Russia lately lol

reply posted on 16-4-2012 @ 11:50 AM by Vasa Croe

And it is these kinds of quotes I am reading about that have me wondering.

www.reuters.com...

For the first time, some officers worry the United States is losing its foothold as new rivals such as China prepare to muscle in.

"We are in many ways an Arctic nation without an Arctic strategy," United States Coast Guard Vice Adml Brian M Salerno told the same Washington DC event.

"ARCTIC BATTALIONS"

The United States has yet to ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which most countries use as the basis for discussing thorny Arctic territorial issues.

Arctic experts point to at least nine separate disputes within the region, from disagreements between the United States and Canada over parts of the Northwest passage to fishing conflicts that also drag in China, Russia, South Korea, Japan and others.

Russia in particular is seen to be keen to assert its presence in a region in which it has long been the dominant power.

It operates almost all of the world's 34 or so icebreakers -- albeit many of them ageing Cold War-era vessels, some powered by nuclear reactors that Western experts say could be a major danger in their own right.

Perhaps just as importantly, its navy continues to view the Arctic as its backyard, vital not just for natural resources essential to maintaining Moscow's economic clout but also the hiding ground for its ballistic missile-carrying nuclear submarine fleet.