It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by pshea38
You're in the UK, am I correct?
No. The pattern is that when persistent contrails occur, there is a massive increase
in air traffic. On days of no peristent contrailing, there are very few planes, and all
have normal short lived contrails.
Cart before the horse, ma man.......cart before the horse.
The frequency of air traffic, over your location, is roughly the SAME....day to day to day.....the airlines fly their schedules. Unless they have major delays, that is....BUT the intent is 'always' to keep to schedule (just like the trains.....yeah...THEY try to stay on schedule, too!! But, things happen, sometimes....am I right??)
Point is....air traffic as scheduled is easy-peasy to look up!! Also, air traffic "live" is easy-peasy to track, nowadays....in this modern era.
SO.....what, oh what is the non-constant in this 'equation'??? OH!!! It's the weather!!! Specifically, the upper atmosphere (you know, where those pesky airliners tend to hang out, and fly over, mucking up the skies....YEAH!! Up there!).
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by pshea38
......Whistleblowing is a dangerous occupation....
Yeah....right......riiiiiiight.......
And yet, you are still 'alive'.
WoW!!!
How incredible!!??!!??
Too bad that your so-called "whistleblowing" is sh#te.........but, at least.....you have a "hobby"....yeah??
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by pshea38
What a crying shame.....when one is so wrapped up in delusion.....
....so yeah.....it was your interpretation of yourself as a "whistleblower"....not mine....
...so, Good Luck with you mental health therapy!!
(If you haven't sought such help yet....then, my apologies.....still....RUN!!! Don't just walk, to your nearest center for help......)
Originally posted by stanguilles7
reply to post by pshea38
If you spent even a fraction of the time on collecting data to prove your claims as you do calling people names, you would have an enormous body of work, and likely be rich and famous.
Originally posted by pshea38
Originally posted by stanguilles7
reply to post by pshea38
If you spent even a fraction of the time on collecting data to prove your claims as you do calling people names, you would have an enormous body of work, and likely be rich and famous.
I no longer suffer paid disinformation agents gladly.
I am rich, though I have few possessions.
Famous? Qu'est que c'est?edit on 16-4-2012 by pshea38 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by pshea38
I no longer suffer paid disinformation agents gladly.
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by Gmoneycricket
you prove there is no cancer causing chemicals in a contrail.
Hey, remember me?
But at the very least, go read the wiki article on contrails and save yourself from looking foolish in these threads.
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
When dicussing "conspiracy" one of the main arguments you'll hear against one actually occuring is "there's no way these things could happen without anyone speaking up" Now when we DO have people "whistle-blowers" speak up, they are imediately discredited, especially if they choose to keep thier identity concealed to protect thier lives and possibly even thier families lives. We're not dealing with "ethical" people here folks!
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
When dicussing "conspiracy" one of the main arguments you'll hear against one actually occuring is "there's no way these things could happen without anyone speaking up" Now when we DO have people "whistle-blowers" speak up, they are imediately discredited, especially if they choose to keep thier identity concealed to protect thier lives and possibly even thier families lives. We're not dealing with "ethical" people here folks!
Indeed - if they are not prepared to put their name to it, and the information is extraordinary and they do not provide any verifiable corroboration, others who are prepared to answer questions and provide verifiable evidence to contradict it, their "facts" prove to be untrue, the predictions fail to materialise,then I agree - they are unethical
Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
That is why I am called a fool,
because I am willing to back up my brag.
Get out your certs.
and lets move on to facts.
Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
So you are willing to,
post your name?
and have facts that there is no chemicals in contrails?
I am willing to post mine,
and prove the emission license's,
I have from 3 states, and testify as an expert witness,
if you are?