reply to post by reeferman
Sorry, but you are just making things up, now?:
the "sky" from the lunar surface is wiped clean always..
some black spot, a smudge here & there..
this is already admitted for "National Security"..
Care to cite an actual source to back up this assertion?
The images you used in this post.....what is their provenance? Image numbers, so people can go to the originals, and see for themselves.
Because.......depending on where you obtained them, then can
have been altered by third parties for many, many reasons. This has long
been discussed here on ATS.
and its never the original film now.. is it?
considering NASA lost the original live copy..
No, all of the images from the Hasselblad cameras can be found here:
Apollo Image Gallery
Apollo Lunar Surface Journal
(NOTE: The above resource includes way, way, way more than just still photos from the Hassies, too).
and as to your smart ass parallax idiotic comment..
brought up the constellations. Did you not mean to infer that the Lunar EVA photos were taken on Earth (as is the claim of
many a "Moon hoax" believer)?? It sure seemed so....by inferring that they had to "ide" the constellations, and this infers that somehow the
arrangement and relationships of the stars to each other, as we see them in the sky, would be "different" by moving only a few hundred thousand
kilometers to "one side". This is what is known as 'parallax'.....and it is a function of math, geometry and trigonometry. The nearest stars
(Alpha Centauri A and B) are on the order of 4.3 LY away. You can work out the math, if you want.....then draw an isosceles triangle with one point
at Alpha Centauri, and the base two points (Earth and Moon), using the distances involved....say, 400,000 kilometers for the base (Earth/Moon), and
the distance to Centauri being the two sides. Then figure out that, at that distance, moving between Earth/Moon would affect your visual perception
of relative movement of Centauri basically ZERO....that
is one way to understand parallax.
AS TO your YTube video of Donna Hare?? She has been debunked long ago.....she travels on the *UFO* circuits, repeating her nonsense.....and in
essence, her claims are moot, since she joined NASA after
Apollo lunar missions had long ended. Even she admits she worked at NASA between
the Apollo and and Space Shuttle programs!!
But, twisting the facts is par for the course, in the 'world' of "hoaxism".......and those 'beliefs'. In other words.....YOU have been lied to,
but not by NASA (Not on this topic....the Lunar Apollo missions).
GO TO this source
, and scroll down to the post by "JimO" from 30 October 2002, and