It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Fine. Stay home. Just pay your own bills, don't expect the taxpayer to pay for your choices.
You completely missed the point. Women with husbands that support them are not asking me to support them. So, I don't care whether they work or not. It is none of my business. BUT as soon as you want to put your hand in my pocket, you become my business.
Originally posted by Daughter2
Boy, did this thread get derailed by some very pro-corporate people.
It was about forcing poor single mothers to work to give them "dignity".
But for HIS KIDS - it was just fine to have his wife stay at home.
To those of you who are saying poor mothers are on a vacation - do you feel that way about stay at home moms with a rich husband?
I disagree. There are many people making that choice every single day. They do whatever they can to get by without working and are proud of doing so.
Originally posted by Daughter2
Raising kids is work whether or not you are rich.
In fact, I would say it's even harder being a poor mom than a rich mom.
It's no vacation being poor enough to be on welfare. It's a very hard life.
There was a post talking about their neighbors - those are rumors. That nice car might have been a friend, church worker or government worker. Those tvs might have been from Goodwill. Those toys might have been from a Christmas charity.
Anyone who has been through it will understand it's not something a person would choose to do if they could find a decent paying job.
Originally posted by ValentineWiggin
Well guess what, they already pay for daycare. It's called ABC Vouchers and you qualify if you have welfare (Now called Family Independence btw) and work or go to school full time. This pays for your child's daycare. Once you are in the FI system you have to search for jobs, return job search forms, and develop a plan in which to get employed as soon as possible. Fantastic, right? In theory.
So your Family Independence support system also includes Food Stamps. AWESOME, now you can actually feed your child. Super.
So you find a job making 9.50 an hour, you have your child in Daycare, you are working 40 hours a week...then guess what? You get that god forsaken perforated paper in the mail from your local DSS office saying "We are sorry, you no longer qualify for FI benefits".
Panic ensues.
Now you have your child enrolled in a Daycare, they are making friends, used to a new routine. Your measley paycheck of what, 640 every two weeks? Is now supposed to cover everything.
So let's break this down...
Your rent is 650 if you are lucky.
Food for you and your child per week is 150 if you are frugal and practically anorexic yourself.
Gas per week is 50 if you don't commute.
Your electricity runs 100 bucks in the dead of summer or cold of winter.
Your water bill is 30-40.
Now you have a daycare bill of 130 bucks a week. 520
Since you no longer qualify for Medicaid you have to pick up your own health care through work. Every two weeks it was 130 bucks for me and my son.
Let's add all that up. 1,630 bucks. You make 1280. Oh yeah, now you cant buy diapers.
You have a respectable job now, you are no longer waiting tables. You have a respectable job now...but you never see your kid and you still can't make ends meet. You have as much money as you did as a waitress on welfare and you saw your kid 4 more hours a day and could also handle going to school part time.
Tell me how this does not keep people within the Welfare system, and I will give you a cookie.edit on 16-4-2012 by ValentineWiggin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
You completely missed the point. Women with husbands that support them are not asking me to support them. So, I don't care whether they work or not. It is none of my business. BUT as soon as you want to put your hand in my pocket, you become my business.
Originally posted by Daughter2
Boy, did this thread get derailed by some very pro-corporate people.
It was about forcing poor single mothers to work to give them "dignity".
But for HIS KIDS - it was just fine to have his wife stay at home.
To those of you who are saying poor mothers are on a vacation - do you feel that way about stay at home moms with a rich husband?
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
I disagree. There are many people making that choice every single day. They do whatever they can to get by without working and are proud of doing so.
Originally posted by Daughter2
Raising kids is work whether or not you are rich.
In fact, I would say it's even harder being a poor mom than a rich mom.
It's no vacation being poor enough to be on welfare. It's a very hard life.
There was a post talking about their neighbors - those are rumors. That nice car might have been a friend, church worker or government worker. Those tvs might have been from Goodwill. Those toys might have been from a Christmas charity.
Anyone who has been through it will understand it's not something a person would choose to do if they could find a decent paying job.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Well if the gravy train ended tomorrow, what would the chronically unemployed do?
There aren't enough jobs, the government created this monster.
Originally posted by Propulsion
If you have to be on unemployment for over 6 months, than I consider you a welfare sucking reciprocate! If you can’t step up in life, than move out to another country that will provide the world to you for free! I don’t care what kind of excuses people try to come up with to avoid work! It might not be what you wish, but the jobs are out there! You might not be making what you once made, but either way, its work! If you’re too proud to work at Mc Donald’s, than don’t complain if you starve! Have “a little” dignity! Do what’s right! Set an example for your children!
Originally posted by Daughter2
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
You completely missed the point. Women with husbands that support them are not asking me to support them. So, I don't care whether they work or not. It is none of my business. BUT as soon as you want to put your hand in my pocket, you become my business.
Originally posted by Daughter2
Boy, did this thread get derailed by some very pro-corporate people.
It was about forcing poor single mothers to work to give them "dignity".
But for HIS KIDS - it was just fine to have his wife stay at home.
To those of you who are saying poor mothers are on a vacation - do you feel that way about stay at home moms with a rich husband?
Wow......
What an ego.....
A poor mother who needs some money to house and feed their kid BECOMES your business!!!!
OK Mr. Ego.... so when a mother does become your business why do you think staying home with kids isn't an important job?
Why do you deem raising kids such a horrible act that you need to change it?edit on April 16th 2012 by Daughter2 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheMindWar
Yeah, nothing like seperating mother from child, how they love to do that.
Originally posted by type0civ
reply to post by xuenchen
and want to be "stay at home parents"
Nothing wrong with that at all..however, I should not have to pay their bills...I've got my own family to take care of.edit on 15-4-2012 by type0civ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Gazrok
reply to post by stanguilles7
So you want to make a Big Government Federal law which incriminates someone getting pregnant?
If they are receiving welfare, absolutely.